The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
God”.[145]
Footnote 144:
Kor. vii, 171.
Footnote 145:
Here the author cites an anecdote of Ibráhím al-Khawwáṣ and al-Ḥalláj
which has been related above. See p. 205.
The Shaykhs have discussed at large the terms by which unification is
denoted. Some say that it is an annihilation that cannot properly be
attained unless the attributes subsist, while others say that it has no
attribute whatever except annihilation. The analogy of union and
separation (_jam` ú tafriqa_) must be applied to this question in order
that it may be understood. I, `Alí b. `Uthmán al-Jullábí, declare that
unification is a mystery revealed by God to His servants, and that it
cannot be expressed in language at all, much less in high-sounding
phrases. The explanatory terms and those who use them are other than
God, and to affirm what is other than God in unification is to affirm
polytheism.
CHAPTER XVII.
THE UNCOVERING OF THE THIRD VEIL: CONCERNING FAITH (_ímán_).
The Apostle said: “Faith is belief in God and His angels and His
(revealed) books.” Etymologically, faith (_ímán_) means verification
(_taṣdíq_). Concerning its principles in their application to the
religious law there is great discussion and controversy. The
Mu`tazilites hold that faith includes all acts of devotion, theoretical
as well as practical: hence they say that sin puts a man outside the
pale of faith. The Khárijites, who call a man an infidel because he
commits a sin, are of the same opinion. Some declare that faith is
simply a verbal profession, while others say it is only knowledge of
God, and a party of Sunní scholastics assert that it is mere
verification. I have written a separate work explaining this subject,
but my present purpose is to establish what the Ṣúfí Shaykhs believe.
They are divided on this question in the same way as the lawyers of the
two opposite sects. Some of them, e.g. Fuḍayl b. `Iyáḍ and Bishr Ḥáfí
and Khayr al-Nassáj and Sumnún al-Muḥibb and Abú Ḥamza of Baghdád and
Muḥammad Jurayrí and a great number of others, hold that faith is verbal
profession and verification and practice; but others, e.g. Ibráhím b.
Adham and Dhu ´l-Nún the Egyptian and Abú Yazíd of Bisṭám and Abú
Sulaymán Dárání and Ḥárith Muḥásibí and Junayd and Sahl b. `Abdalláh of
Tustar and Shaqíq of Balkh and Ḥátim Aṣamm and Muḥammad b. al-Faḍl of
Balkh and a number besides, hold that faith is verbal profession and
verification. Some lawyers, i.e. Málik and Sháfi`í and Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal,
maintain the former view, while the latter opinion is supported by Abú
Ḥanífa and Ḥusayn b. Faḍl of Balkh and the followers of Abú Ḥanífa, such
as Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan, Dáwud Ṭá´í, and Abú Yúsuf. The difference
between them is entirely one of expression and is devoid of substance,
as I will now briefly explain, in order that no one may be charged with
contradicting the principle of faith because he takes the one view or
the other in this dispute.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account