The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
station of the prophets and apostles.[149] _Tawbat_ is to return from
great sins to obedience; _inábat_ is to return from minor sins to love;
and _awbat_ is to return from one’s self to God. Repentance (_tawbat_)
has its origin in the stern prohibitions of God and in the heart’s being
aroused from the slumber of heedlessness. When a man considers his evil
conduct and abominable deeds he seeks deliverance therefrom, and God
makes it easy for him to repent and leads him back to the sweetness of
obedience. According to the opinion of orthodox Moslems and all the Ṣúfí
Shaykhs, a man who has repented of one sin may continue to commit other
sins and nevertheless receive Divine recompense for having abstained
from that one sin; and it may be that through the blessing of that
recompense he will abstain from other sins. But the Bahshamí[150] sect
of the Mu`tazilites hold that no one can properly be called repentant
unless he avoids all great sins, a doctrine which is absurd, because a
man is not punished for the sins that he does not commit, but if he
renounces a certain kind of sin he has no fear of being punished for
sins of that particular kind: consequently, he is repentant. Similarly,
if he performs some religious duties and neglects others, he will be
rewarded for those which he performed and will be punished for those
which he neglected. Moreover, if anyone should have repented of a sin
which he has not the means of committing at the moment, he is repentant,
because through that past repentance he has gained contrition
(_nadámat_), which is a fundamental part of repentance (_tawbat_), and
at the moment he has turned his back on that kind of sin and is resolved
not to commit it again, even though he should have the power and means
of doing so at some future time. As regards the nature and property of
repentance, the Ṣúfí Shaykhs hold diverse opinions. Sahl b. `Abdalláh
(al-Tustarí) and others believe that repentance consists in not
forgetting your sins, but always regretting them, so that, although you
have many good works to your credit, you will not be pleased with
yourself on that account; since remorse for an evil action is superior
to good works, and one who never forgets his sins will never become
conceited. Junayd and others take the opposite view, that repentance
consists in forgetting the sin. They argue that the penitent is a lover
of God, and the lover of God is in contemplation of God, and in
contemplation it is wrong to remember sin, for remembrance of sin is a
veil between God and those who contemplate Him. This controversy goes
back to the difference of opinion concerning mortification (_mujáhadat_)
and contemplation (_musháhadat_), which has been discussed in my account
of the doctrine of the Sahlís. Those who hold the penitent to be
self-dependent regard his forgetfulness of sin as heedlessness, while
those who hold that he is dependent on God deem his remembrance of sin
to be polytheism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account