Hence the terrible disappointment: after Webster had been at school
long enough for grading to begin to come home as to what faculties
he possessed and the progress he made, his parents discovered to
their terror and shame that he was good in nothing and least good in
arithmetic. It was like a child's turning against his own bread and
butter and shirt and shoes. To his father it meant a clear family
breakdown. The moment had come to him which, in unlike ways, comes to
many a father when he feels obliged to say: "This is no son of mine."
In reality, Webster's father had had somewhat that feeling from the
first. When summoned and permitted, he had tipped into the room on the
day of Webster's birth and taken a father's anxious defensive look. He
had turned off with a gesture of repudiation but of the deepest respect:
"No such head and countenance ever descended to him from me! We must
be square with him from the start! I place to his credit the name of
Daniel Webster. His mother, instead of admiring her husband, had been
gazing too fondly at the steel engraving of the statesman over the
mantelpiece in the parlour."
When Webster was several years old, one day during a meal--nobody knew
just what brought forth the question--he asked:
"Why was I named Webster?"
His father answered:
"Because you looked like him."
Webster got up quietly and went into the parlour and quietly returned
to his seat at table:
"No, I don't look like him," he said.
"You looked like him the day you were born, my son. Any resemblance to
Daniel Webster is apt to become less and less. Finally, you don't look
like him any more. In the United States Senate nowadays, for instance,
there isn't a trace of resemblance left anywhere. Senators at present
look more like me and you know what that means: it means that nobody
need feel obliged to think of Daniel Webster!"
That birthday jest--that he was not quite entitled to the nativity
of his own son, an uneasiness perhaps inherited by fathers from the
rudimentary marriages of primitive society--was but a jest then.
It gradually took on serious meaning as his son grew further away
from him with each year of growth. The bad passing of the arithmetic
milestone had brought the worst distinct shock. Still, even that left
Webster's father perfectly balanced, perfectly behaved: he remained
proud of his unlike offspring, fed and clothed him, and was fond of him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account