The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 2, August 1843 — John Shaqi
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 2, August 1843Various
General
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 2, August 1843
Various
Periodicals
The frequent use of aphorisms and proverbial phrases has in all
ages been regarded as a vulgarism. Many of them are strikingly true
and extremely elegant, having emanated from thoughtful and polished
minds; yet in their daily use among writers and speakers of all
classes, they become soiled and worn, familiar and profane. They
acquire the tone of cant, and are resigned to the possession of
those who cannot think and speak for themselves. In the fragments
of the old Greek comedy and in others of their familiar writers, we
find proverbs usually given up to the subordinate characters. Even
in Euripides, 'the philosopher of the scenes,' nearly all whose
personages harangue in sententious monostichs like disputants in the
Academus or declaimers from the Stoa, the proverbial style is mostly
left to messengers and attendants, pedagogues and nurses. Among the
Romans, Plautus is most profuse in adages, and with him they drop,
thick and fast, from the mouths of pimps and parasites, courtesans,
and slaves. Horace employs them seldom, save when personating some
humble character; and Cicero, even in his 'Familiar Letters,'
often prefaces their introduction by an apologetic 'ut aiunt'--'as
they say.' Every one, who has read (and who has _not_ read?) the
romance of the renowned Cid Hamet Benengeli, remembers the ludicrous
distress suffered by the knight of La Mancha in hearing his squire
discharge whole broadsides of rustic proverbs at all times and
on all subjects. The Italian language overflows with these trite
familiarities. The low characters in the early English comedies, and
the old English writers in general, abound in these homely texts,
which teach the rustic moralist to _live_. If the novelists of this
age of gas and steam-boats place in the mouths of their subaltern
heroes few of the thread-bare aphorisms so common in the works of
Smollet and Fielding, it is because the 'ignobility' of the present
day have arrived at great perfection in a peculiar dialect--a
compound of buffoonery and sentiment, of poetry and flash. In place
of the quaint proverbs and worn allusions, in which their ancestors
couched their humble thoughts, they bedizen their every-day attire
of flimsy cant and coarse burlesque with borrowed flowers of fancy
and the stolen jewelry of wit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account