The Knights of St. John : $b with the Battle of Lepanto and Siege of ViennaDrane, Augusta Theodosia
History
The Knights of St. John : $b with the Battle of Lepanto and Siege of Vienna
Drane, Augusta Theodosia
Knights of Malta; Lepanto, Battle of, Greece, 1571; Vienna (Austria) -- History -- Siege, 1683
The divisions and dissensions of that unhappy time no doubt
contributed in a great degree to the rapid extension of the Turkish
conquests. First and foremost, and that which lay at the root of all
the rest, was the disastrous schism which ensued on the death of
Gregory XI., when a pope and an anti-pope claimed the obedience of
the nations. Christendom, thus divided against itself, had no time
to give to the danger that threatened it from without; the western
powers, engaged in contesting the pretensions of two rival claimants
of the papal chair, were unable to unite against the common foe.
The Christian world was, in fact, bereft of its directing head:
the popes had ever been the life and soul of the crusades against
the infidel; and when their voice was dumb, or gave, or at least
seemed to give, an uncertain sound, who could prepare himself for
the battle? As regarded the order of the Knights Hospitallers, the
evil was unmitigated. Our purpose in the present sketch being less
to offer a continuous history of the order of St. John than to
recount their struggles with the Moslems, we must pass rapidly over
the period during which Heredia, the prior of Castile, was grand
master, and redeemed his previous disloyal conduct by a government
of remarkable disinterestedness and devotion. Brave he was even to
daring. At the siege of Patras he mounted the breach, sword in hand,
careless whether his knights followed him or no, and flinging himself
with all the ardour of a young soldier into the midst of the Turks,
encountered the governor in single combat and laid him dead at the
foot of the wall he had been defending. At Corinth, which was the
next point of attack, he fell into an ambush and was taken prisoner.
The order offered the restitution of Patras, together with a large
sum of money, for his ransom, and three of the grand priors even
engaged to remain as hostages in his place until the conditions were
fulfilled: but though the Turks consented, Heredia magnanimously
rejected the proposal. “Leave me, my dear brothers,” he said, “leave
me, worn out as I am with years and toil, to die in my chains, and
reserve yourselves who are young and active for the service of God
and His Church.” As for the money, he would not hear of its being
paid out of the treasury of the order; it should come from his own
family, whom his ambition had enriched. One would have thought that
the infidels would have been moved to generosity by so much nobility
of soul; but all the effect it had upon them was, that they condemned
him to a severer confinement, in which he was detained for more
than three years. On his release, he made ample reparation for his
previous avarice by devoting the wealth he had accumulated to the
foundation of new commanderies and other means of defence against
the untiring enemy of the Christian name; but all his efforts and
self-sacrifices were paralysed and rendered of little avail by the
divisions that prevailed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account