The Knights of St. John : $b with the Battle of Lepanto and Siege of Vienna — John Shaqi
The Knights of St. John : $b with the Battle of Lepanto and Siege of ViennaDrane, Augusta Theodosia
History
The Knights of St. John : $b with the Battle of Lepanto and Siege of Vienna
Drane, Augusta Theodosia
Knights of Malta; Lepanto, Battle of, Greece, 1571; Vienna (Austria) -- History -- Siege, 1683
Athens was taken in 1397,
and the Crescent, the symbol of barbarism, shone over the ancient
seat of learning and the arts. The metropolis of the East, for which
the emperor gained a temporary but ignominious respite by turning
one of the churches of the city into a mosque, and consenting to pay
an annual tribute of 10,000 ducats, would doubtless have speedily
fallen into the power of Bajazet but for the appearance at that
moment of a rival on the scene. Manuel Palæologus had in vain sought
the assistance of the European princes; the wars in which they were
engaged prevented their heeding his appeal. In his extremity he
had recourse to Timour the Terrible,[7] the khan of Tartary, whose
jealousy of Bajazet’s successes induced him readily to listen to
the embassies of the Greek emperor. The result is well known: on
the plains of Angora (A.D. 1402),—the same where Pompey overthrew
the power of Mithridates,—the Turks and Tartars met, and after a
bloody contest the triumphs of Bajazet were terminated for ever,
and he himself, falling into the hands of his savage conqueror, was
subjected to a captivity the ignominy of which has gained for him a
compassion and sympathy to which his crimes and infamous vices were
far from entitling him.
It followed as a matter of course, that the dominions of Bajazet were
simply transferred into the hands of Timour; and with the single
exception of the knights of Rhodes, all the princes of the East
submitted to his yoke, or acceded to his alliance. Their stubborn
independence brought on them a declaration of war from the Tartar
despot. It seemed insufferable that one small island should presume
to withhold its allegiance to a monarch whose dominions exceeded
those of Alexander and of every conqueror the world had ever seen,
and whose power was acknowledged by the Christian sovereigns of
Anatolia, as well as in all the provinces of the East; yet Rhodes,
small as it was, presented so formidable an aspect, with its masses
of fortifications, that he determined on first of all reducing the
city of Smyrna, whose position in the very heart of the Asiatic
provinces seemed to bid defiance to his arms. Timour’s object was,
however, scarcely so much the actual subjection of the place as the
gratification of a proud ambition; and well knowing that a city
which had so long resisted the power of the Turks would prove no easy
conquest, he declared to William de Mina, the governor appointed
by the grand master, that he would be contented if his banner were
suffered to float from the citadel, without proceeding to a siege,
or depriving the knights of their actual possession. But the demand
was scornfully rejected: not that the Hospitallers for one moment
entertained a hope of withstanding the attack of the Tartars,
unsupported as they were by any succours from Europe, and isolated
in the midst of the enemy’s dominions; but Smyrna was the post of
honour which, intrusted to them as it had been by the Pope himself,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account