The exact English counterpart of which,—(I owe it to the kind help of M. Neubauer, of the Bodleian),—is subjoined. The Reader will scarcely require to be reminded that the reason why §§ 282, 287, 289 do not appear in this Table is because those Sections, (belonging to the tenth Canon,) have nothing parallel to them in the other Gospels. _Luke_ _Matthew_ _Mark_ _John_ _Luke_ _Matthew_ _Mark_ 391 ... 286 247 390 421 281 ... 426 288 247 390 421 283 ... 391 ... 284 ... 393 ... 285 The general intention of this is sufficiently obvious: but the Reader must be told that on making reference to S. MATTHEW’S Gospel, in this Syriac Codex, it is found that § 421 = chap, xxviii. 8; and § 426 = chap. xxviii. 19, 20: That, in S. LUKE’S Gospel,—§ 390 = chap. xxiv. 8-10: § 391 = chap. xxiv. 11; and § 393 = chap. xxiv. 13-17:(560) That, in S. JOHN’S Gospel,—§ 247 = chap. xx. 17 (πορεύου down to Θεὸν ὑμῶν.) So that, exhibited in familiar language, these Syriac _Marginal References_ are intended to guide a Reader, (§ 281) From S. Mark xvi. 8,—to S. Matth. xxviii. 8: S. Luke From S. Mark xxiv. 8-10: S. John xx. 17 (πορεύου _to the end of the verse_). (§ 283) From S. Mark xvi. 10,—to the same three places. (§ 284) From S. Mark xvi. 11,—to S. Luke xxiv. 11. (§ 285) From S. Mark xvi. 12,—to S. Luke xxiv. 13-17. (§ 286) From S. Mark xvi. 13,—to S. Luke xxiv. 11. (§ 288) From S. Mark xvi. 15,—to S. Matth. xxiv. 19, 20. Here then, although the Ten Eusebian Canons are faithfully retained, it is much to be noted that we are presented with _a different set of Sectional subdivisions_. This will be best understood by attentively comparing all the details which precede with the Eusebian references in the inner margin of a copy of Lloyd’s Greek Testament. But the convincing _proof_ that these Syriac Sections are not those with which we have been hitherto acquainted from Greek MSS., is supplied by the fact that they are so many more _in number_. The sum of the Sections in each of the Gospels follows; for which, (the Bodleian Codex being mutilated,) I am indebted to the learning and obligingness of Dr. Wright.(561) He quotes from “the beautiful MS. Addit. 7,157, written A.D. 768.”(562) From this, it appears that the Sections in the Gospel according to,— S. MATTHEW, (instead of being from 359 to 355,) are 426: (the last Section, § 426/6, consisting of ver. 19, 20.) S. MARK, (instead of being from 241 to 233,) are 290: (the last Section, § 290/8, consisting of ver. 19, 20.) S. LUKE, (instead of being from 349 to 342,) are 402: (the last Section, § 402/10, consisting of ver. 52, 53.) S. JOHN, (instead of being 232,) is 271: (the last Section, § 271/10, consisting of ver. 18-25.)