197 Vat. 756, 757 = our Evan. 137, 138. 198 Quo signo tamquam censoria virgula usi sunt librarii, qua Evangelistarum narrationes, in omnibus Codicibus non obvias, tamquam dubias notarent.—_Variae Lectiones_, &c. p. 225. 199 In Cod. 264 (= Paris 65) for instance, besides at S. Mk. xvi. 9, + occurs at xi. 12, xii. 38, and xiv. 12. On the other hand, no such sign occurs at the _pericope de adulterá_. 200 Further obligations to the same friend are acknowledged in the Appendix (D). 201 Similarly, in Cod. Coisl. 20, in the Paris Library, (which = our 36,) against S. Mark xvi. 9, is this sign [symbol: inverse or open x]. It is intended (like an asterisk in a modern book) to refer the reader to the self-same annotation which is spoken of in the text as occurring in Cod. Vat. 756, and which is observed to occur in the margin of the Paris MS. also. 202 ἐντεῦθεν ἔως τοῦ τέλους ἔν τισι τῶν ἀντιγράφων οὐ κεῖται: ἐν δε τοῖς ἀρχαίοις, πάντα ἀπαράλειπτα κεῖται.—(Codd. 20 and 300 = Paris 188, 186.) 203 See more concerning this matter in the Appendix (D), _ad fin._ 204 At the end of S. Matthew’s Gospel in Cod. 300 (at fol. 89) is found,— εὐαγγέλιον κατὰ Ματθαῖον ἐγράφη καὶ ἀντεβλήθη ἐκ τῶν Ἱεροσολύμοις παλαιὼν ἀντιγράφων, ἐν στίχοις βφιδ and at the end of S. Mark’s, (at fol. 147 _b_)— εὐαγγέλιον κατὰ Ματθαῖον ἐγράφη καὶ ἀντεβλήθη ὁμοίως ἐκ τῶν ἐσπουδασμένων στίχοις αφς κεφαλαίοις σλξ This second colophon (though not the first) is found in Cod. 20. _Both_ reappear in Cod. 262 ( = Paris 53), and (with an interesting variety in the former of the two) in [what I suppose is the first half of] the uncial Codex Λ. See Scrivener’s _Introduction_, p. 125. 205 = Paris 72, _fol._ 107 _b_. He might have added, (for Wetstein had pointed it out 79 years before,) that _the same note precisely_ is found between verses 8 and 9 in Cod. 15 ( = Paris 64,) _fol._ 98 _b_. 206 See more at the very end of Chap. XI. 207 Cod. 1. (at Basle), and Codd. 206, 209 (which = Venet. 6 and 10) contain as follows:— ἔν τισι μὲν τῶν ἀντιγράφων ἕως ὧδε πληροῦται ὁ Εὐαγγελιστὴς, ἕως οἱ καὶ Ἐυσέβιος ὁ Παμφίλου ἐκανόνισεν; ἐν ἄλλοις δὲ ταῦτα φέρεται; ἀναστὰς, κ.τ.λ. But Cod. 199 (which = S. Mariae Benedict. Flor. Cod. IV. [_lege_ 5],) according to Birch (p. 226) who supplies the quotation, has only this:— ἔν τισι τῶν ἀντιγράφων οὐ κεῖνται [?] ταῦτα.