European literature -- Renaissance, 1450-1600 -- History and criticism; Renaissance; Spanish literature -- History and criticism
more violent in English than in Spanish:--
Piramo fueron y Tisbe,
_Pyramus they were and Tisbe,_
Los que en verso hizo culto
_Those who in verse made[16] polished_
El Licenciado Nason
_The Licentiate Naso_
Bien romo ó bien narigudo
_Maybe snub, maybe beak_
Dejar el dulce candor
_To leave the sweet white_
Lastimosamente obscuro
_Lamentably dark_
Al que, túmulo de seda,
_Of that which, tomb of silk,_
Fue de los dos casquilucios
_Was of the two feather-heads_
Moral que los hospedó
_Mulberry which gave them shelter_
Y fue condenando al punto
_And was condemned at once_
Si del Tigris no en raizes
_If by the Tigris not in root_
De los amantes en frutos.
_By the lovers in fruit._
Don Cristobal de Salazar Mardones explains in prose, and with copious
references to Ovid, _Meta._, lib. iv., that what this means is that
the mulberry-tree was not torn up by the roots as a punishment by the
Tigris, but was coloured by the blood of the lovers. The reader will
see at once that this is puerile nonsense, and that it is a mere trick.
It is also a very old trick. When Thiodolf of Hvin, whose verse riddles
adorn the _Heimskringla_, wrote of a certain king--
“Now hath befallen
In Frodi’s house
The word of fate
To fall on Fiolnir;
That the windless wave
Of the wild bull’s spears
That lord should do
To death by drowning,”--
he was writing in “góngorina especie”--that is, in what was to be the
manner of Góngora. The whole secret lay, as Lope de Vega, indeed,
pointed out, in never calling anything by its right name, and in
transposing words violently. Given a great deal of bad taste, and
a puerile mania for making people stare, and the thing is easily
accounted for. In such conditions it may be thought clever to call mead
which men drink out of horns “the windless wave of the wild bull’s
spear,” or to describe a mulberry-tree as a tumulus of silk, though
the mistake was incomparably more excusable in Thiodolf of Hvin than
in Góngora, and the Norseman seems on the whole to have been the least
silly of the two. The comparison which has been made between Góngorism
and our own metaphysical school is too favourable to the Spaniards, in
whom there was absolutely nothing but juggling with words.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account