The Law and Medical MenRogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
History
The Law and Medical Men
Rogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
Medical laws and legislation
[91] 21 & 22 Vict. cap. 90, secs. 31, 32; _Wagstaffe_ v. _Sharpe_, 3 M.
& W. 521; _Shearwood_ v. _Hay_, 5 Ad. & E. 383; _Turner_ v. _Reynall_,
14 C. B. N. S. 328.
[92] 21 & 22 Vict. cap. 90, sec. 15.
[93] Enc. Brit. Vol. xv. p. 799.
[94] R. S. O. cap. 142.
[95] _Reg._ v. _Coll. Phy. & Sur._, 44 Ont. Q. B. 564.
[96] _Reg._ v. _Hessel_, 44 Ont. Q. B. 53 _Reg._ v. _Campbell_, Q. B.
D. (Ont.) June, 1883.
[97] _Reg._ v. _Tefft_, 45 Ont. Q. B. 144.
[98] _Wilmot_ v. _Shaw_, 2 C. L. Times, 96.
[99] _Reg._ v. _Coll. P. & S._ 16 C. L. J. 30; R. S. O. cap. 142, sec.
23.
[100] _Re Heinemann’s Appeal_, 96 Pa. St. 112.
[101] Ordronaux’s Inst. of Med., secs. 5 and 6; _Sutton_ v. _Tracy_, 1
Mich. 243.
[102] N. Y. Laws, cap. 436.
[103] _Corsi_ v. _Maretzek_, 4 E. D. Smith, 1.
[104] _Bradbury_ v. _Bardin_, 35 Conn. 577.
[105] _Bowman_ v. _Woods_, 1 Iowa, 441.
[106] _Smith_ v. _Lane_, 24 Hun, 632.
[107] _Bibber_ v. _Simpson_, 59 Me. 181; _Thistleton_ v. _Frewer_, 31
L. J. Ex. 230.
[108] _Patten_ v. _Wiggin_, 51 Me. 594.
[109] _Bowman_ v. _Woods_, 1 Iowa, 441.
[110] _Horton_ v. _Green_, 64 N. C. 64.
[111] Ordronaux, sec. 8.
[112] _Sutton_ v. _Tracy_, 1 Mich. 243; _Reynolds_ v. _Graves_, 3 Wisc.
416.
[113] _Langdon_ v. _Mut. Life Ins. Co._, 5 Hun. N. Y. 1.
[114] Per Cur., in _Dr. Greonvelt’s_ case, 1 Lord Ray, 213.
[115] Glenn, p. 251; Addison on Torts, Ed. 3rd, p. 17.
[116] Glenn, p. 252; Erle, C.J., _R._ v. _Noakes_, 4 F. & F. 920.
[117] _Gardiner_ v. _Heartt_, 3 Denio, 232–236; McClelland’s Civil
Malpractice, cap. 17.
[118] Wharton on Negligence, sec. 3.
[119] _Carpenter_ v. _Blake_, 60 Barb. 488.
[120] McClelland, cap. 17.
[121] Wharton, sec. 731.
[122] _Wilmot_ v. _Howard_, 32 Vt. 447; _Long_ v. _Morrison_, 14 Ind.
595; _Patten_ v. _Wiggin_, 51 Me. 594.
[123] _Hancke_ v. _Hooper_, 7 C. & P. 81.
[124] _Patten_ v. _Wiggin_, 51 Me. 594.
[125] _Leighton_ v. _Sargent_, 7 Fost. 460; _Simonds_ v. _Henry_, 39
Me. 155; _Hancke_ v. _Hooper_, 7 C. & P. 81; _McCandless_ v. _McWha_,
22 Pa. St. 261; _Carpenter_ v. _Blake_, 60 Barb. 488; _Utley_ v.
_Burns_, 70 Ill. 162; _Barnes_ v. _Means_, 82 Ill. 379.
[126] _Heath_ v. _Gibson_, 3 Oregon, 64.
[127] _Slater_ v. _Baker_, 2 Wils. 359; _McCandless_ v. _McWha_, sup.;
Wh. and Still. Medic. Juris. sec. 1087.
[128] Bouvier’s Institutes, secs. 1004–1005.
[129] Ordronaux’s Jurisp. of Medicine, sec. 23.
[130] _Rich_ v. _Pierpoint_, 3 F. & F. 35.
[131] Wharton on Negligence, sec. 734.
[132] Ordronaux, sec. 22.
[133] Wharton on Negligence, sec. 640.
[134] _Small_ v. _Howard_, 128 Mass. 131; _Hathorn_ v. _Richmond_, 48
Vt. 557.
[135] Woodward, J., in _McCandless_ v. _McWha_, 22 Pa. Rep. 261.
[136] _Mich. Cent. Rw._ v. _Hasseneyer_, 48 Mich. 205; _Fox_ v.
_Glastonbury_, 29 Conn. 204.
[137] Shearman & Red., sec. 432.
[138] _Patten_ v. _Wiggen_, 51 Me. 594.
[139] _Rich_ v. _Pierpoint_, per Erle, C.J., 3 F. & F. 35.
[140] _Carpenter_ v. _Blake_, 60 Barb. 488.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account