Law -- England; Poor -- England; Poor laws -- England; Working class -- England
In politics it is absurd to expect individuals to kick against the pricks,
and I do not know of any politician who, deeply as he may believe in the
justice and expediency of abolishing imprisonment for debt, has ever cared
to take up the matter and place it prominently before his constituents in
the hope of being able to convince them that it would make for the
greatest happiness of the greatest number. The general belief seems to be
that the influence of the shopkeeping and travelling trading classes would
be used against such a Quixote, and he would receive a severe warning to
stick to the ordinary hack lines of political talk and not risk his seat
tilting at windmills.
The attitude of the Labour party is even more peculiar. Outwardly and
individually they, of course, being more thoughtful and experienced about
the wants of the poor, agree very heartily that imprisonment for debt is a
class institution which should be abolished. But they certainly show no
great enthusiasm in taking a hand at working for its abolition. This is
partly due, no doubt, to the fact that they are business men and not
theorists and have other and nearer work to do. They would, I make no
doubt, support any measure of abolition, but it is essentially a legal
reform and they would wait for some legal authority to initiate it.
There is too, undoubtedly, at the back of the Labour mind the idea that
imprisonment for debt may be a very present help in time of trouble. In
the Select Committee of 1893 Mr. William Johnson, a miner's agent, gave
evidence in favour of imprisonment for debt; he asserted that nine-tenths
of his men did not desire its abolition and were in favour of its
continuance. Later on he pointed out that in case of sickness or in the
case of non-employment, "and probably in the case of strikes," credit
given under the sanction of imprisonment for debt would be useful.
Unemployment and sickness are now largely dealt with by insurance, and
from a public point of view the idea that strikes should be financed by
the small tradesmen and, in case of their bankruptcy, ultimately by the
wholesale trade, is not an attractive one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account