The Lenape Stone; or, The Indian and the MammothMercer, Henry C.
History
The Lenape Stone; or, The Indian and the Mammoth
Mercer, Henry C.
Delaware Indians; Mammoths; Picture-writing, Indian
The execution of such imitations also usually betrays their
origin. The lines on the Lenape Stone are obviously cut with a
metal instrument, making clean incisions, deepest in the centre
and tapering to points--quite different from the scratch of a
flint point. Shrewder fabricators than the unknown author of
this one make use of flint points. Some of the Western "tablets"
have been so inscribed. They may thus conceal their tools, but
there are other resources for the archæologist. The surface of
all stones undergoes a certain chemical change on exposure to
the air, which is called by the French term _patine_. In many
varieties, as flints, jasper, and hard shales, this affords
a decisive means of discriminating a modern from an ancient
inscription or arrow-head. It requires the use of the microscope
and some practice, but with these most of such impostures can
be detected. This does not exhaust the resources at the command
of the antiquary to circumvent those who would practise on his
love for relics of the past. But I have said enough to show that
opinions on relics need neither be vague nor prejudiced. It is
most desirable that the citizens of our Commonwealth should
take an earnest interest in the collection of our aboriginal
remains, and it is gratifying to learn that Bucks County is not
behindhand in this direction.
Respectfully yours,
[Signed] D. G. BRINTON, M.D.
From the Bucks County _Intelligencer_
of Sept. 6, 1884.
Letter from Mr. H. Carvill Lewis, Professor of Mineralogy, Academy of
Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 19, 1884.
CAPT. J. S. BAILEY:
_Dear Sir_:--Upon careful examination I am convinced that the
mammoth on the Indian tablet is a forgery, being copied directly
from the drawing of a mammoth on a piece of ivory found in the
cave of La Madeleine, Perigord, France. The tablet is genuine,
but the drawing upon it is recent.
Who do you think perpetrated this fraud?
Yours, very truly,
[Signed] H. CARVILL LEWIS.
Letter from Dr. F. W. Putnam, Curator of the Peabody Museum of
Archæology, Cambridge, Mass.
CAMBRIDGE, March 17, 1884.
DEAR MR. MERCER:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account