Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
But now let’s turn to the story. It is vital and well told. Nobody can
imitate Anderson, of course, but that is not what we want anyway. Your
story stands on its own feet quite well. In some places it is too
accented. I say this in spite of my realization of the intent of it and
also via recommending the very effective literary device of
under-accentuation in just the right place to produce “overtones” of
overwhelming effect. Then you could afford to be more sparing of
adjectives! But I won’t rail any further! You certainly are displaying
evidence and promises of a hopeful career. If you don’t get too
engrossed in commerce after you leave college the break will do you
good, I think. No matter how “free” one may be in college, the campus
world with its idols and codes is very different from the world outside.
Don’t think, please, that I’m decrying education, it’s only a mention
that things are somehow harder and a little “scarey.” “Practical people”
suddenly surround one, and they have such an insistence about being
listened to. --/--/
The more speed I develop in ad-writing the more occasion I’m given to
use it, and I seem to need to keep in touch with so many people that the
hours spent at home are too few. This hankering for continual
conversational excitement is one of my weaknesses. What I _should_ be
doing is working. Truly, on this gay Sunday afternoon, my conscience is
weighted.
94: TO GORHAM MUNSON
[_Cleveland_] _April 19th --’22_
Dear Gorham: --/--/ The two copies of _Secession_ reached me yesterday.
Of course they were immediately and doubly devoured. But right here I
ought to stop--I have so many things to say about it. --/--/
I find I have many, at least several disagreements with you. I can’t say
nearly so much for Matty’s poem as you do--I mean the Café phallicus.
The Tzara poem is perfectly flat. The Cowley poem is encouraging,
although dreadfully alike something he had published in one of the last
_L.R’s_. The Aragon prose is, in its odd way, a quite beautiful thing.
But what has happened to Matty!?! And,--just _why_ is Apollinaire so
portentous a god? Will radios, flying machines, and cinemas have such a
great effect on poetry in the end? All this talk of Matty’s is quite
stimulating, but it’s like coffee--twenty-four hours afterward not much
remains to work with. It is metallic and pointillistic--not derogatory
terms to my mind at all, but somehow thin,--a little too slender and
“smart”--after all.
O Matty must be amusing himself perfectly in Paris. And so he took you
to be a real, honest-to-God disreputable and commercial editor! Serve
you right, you bad boy, following the primrose path of the magazines!
--/--/
95: TO CHARMION WIEGAND
_Cleveland, Ohio_ _May 6th, ’22_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account