The Library of Work and Play: HousekeepingGilman, Elizabeth Hale
General
The Library of Work and Play: Housekeeping
Gilman, Elizabeth Hale
Home economics
It is not hard to deduce from the complaints made on both sides that
the problem of domestic service is a problem of personal relationship.
Its solution then depends upon the discovery of a possible and wise
relation between mistress and maid, which it will become the general
purpose to establish and preserve.
At least two alternatives lie already before those who would discover
this relationship. One is to recognize and endeavour to perfect the
system of domestic service which has been for centuries in use;
the other is to develop and establish a new system which lies as a
possibility in the minds of many people and has been sporadically
tried. For convenience, I shall name these two and call the first, the
patriarchal system, the second, the business system.
The patriarchal system of domestic service has been in use some time.
It probably began when the first woman brought the first man his
food for love's sake. Then one day she was ill or the baby needed
her and she asked some other woman to take it to him for the sake
of neighbourliness. Then perhaps in a time of dearth it occured to
an impoverished woman to serve another for the sake of food and
clothes--and so it all began.
Up to a very recent time servants were often permanent members of the
household. The phrase "a family servant" and a very few representatives
of the class are still with us. The relation between such servants and
their masters and mistresses was a personal and moral one. At its best,
the servant gave time, work, strength, loyalty and love, for life; the
master and mistress gave food, clothes, shelter, protection, nursing,
affection and a home, for life.
One cannot say how widely this ideal prevailed, but certainly it once
existed in thought and fact as it does not now. Times have changed,
have they not? And changed so quickly that we hardly know just where
we are in regard to servants. Servants on the one side, masters and
mistresses on the other side, have dropped the responsibility out of
their relationship and yet they fondly expect other things to remain
unchanged. One woman complains that her servants are "disrespectful,"
another that they are "ungrateful," another that "they do not care
anything about her." Suppose a servant should suddenly turn and ask
us, "Do you care anything about me? Do you know about my childhood? Do
you know how many brothers and sisters I have, and whether my father
and mother are yet alive? Do you know what things make me glad or gay,
what interests or hopes I have? If I am faithful to you, will you teach
me and help me in my ignorance and my sins, and at last protect my
helpless old age?"
If your cook should suddenly turn on you with these questions--on you,
who own to having fifteen cooks in two months, or even on you who
grieve because servants are not respectful, would not either of you
discharge her at once and say you were "never so insulted in your life?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account