The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.Romanes, George John
Science
The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.
Romanes, George John
Naturalists -- Great Britain -- Biography; Romanes, George John, 1848-1894
I have now made a number of grafts at Kew. In about a month, I
should think, one could see which are coming up as single and
which as double sprouts. If, therefore, Frank is going to work
in the laboratory in July, he might perhaps look over the bed
(which is just outside the door), and reject the double-stalked
specimens. I could trust him to do this better than any one at
Kew, and if the useless specimens were rejected, there would
afterwards be much less trouble in protecting the valuable
ones. But do not suggest it unless you think it would be quite
agreeable to him. If he is in town within the next fortnight, I
wish he would look me up.
June 16.
I have deferred answering your letter until having had a talk
with Mr. Galton about rudimentary organs. He thinks with me that
if the normal size of a useful organ is maintained in a species,
when natural selection is removed, the average size will tend to
become progressively reduced by inter-crossing, and this down to
whatever extent economy of growth remains operative in placing a
premium on variations below the average at any given stage in the
history of reduction.
I think I thoroughly well know your views about natural
selection. In writing the manuscript note, so far as I remember,
I had in view the possibility which Huxley somewhere advocates,
that nature may sometimes make a considerable leap by selecting
from single variations. But it was not because of this point that
I sent you the note; it was with reference to the possibility of
natural selection acting on organic _types_ as distinguished from
individuals--a possibility which you once told me did not seem at
all clear, although Wallace maintained it in conversation.
I do not myself think that Allen[11] made out his points,
although I do think that he has made an effort in the right
direction. It seems to me that his fundamental principle has
probably much truth in it, viz. that æsthetic pleasure in its
last analysis is an effect of normal or not excessive stimulation.
Very sincerely and most respectfully yours,
GEO. J. ROMANES.
_From C. Darwin, Esq._
Down, Beckenham, Kent: August 9.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account