The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sourcesThomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sources
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, 1592-1628
A change was observed to have taken place in the deportment of
Buckingham almost immediately on his return from Spain. He became
affable, and, therefore, “suddenly and strangely gracious among the
multitude,” so that, as Sir Henry Wotton expresses it, “he did seem for
a time to have overcome that natural incompatibility which, in the
experience of all ages, hath ever been noted between the vulgar and the
sovereign favour. But this was no more than a meer bubble or blast, and
like an ephemeral bit of applause, as eftsoon will appear in the sequel
and train of his life.”[61]
Footnote 61:
Reliquiæ Wottonianæ, 219.
Shortly after his return from Spain, fresh honours were added to those
with which Buckingham had been so richly endowed. The King, it was
observed, had now grown into “an habitual and confirmed custom” of
loading his favourite with benefits; and the Duke was, accordingly, made
Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, and Steward of the Manor of Hampton
Court; “dignities and offices,” says Sir Henry Wotton, “still growing
out of trust and profit.”
But this apparent prosperity was alloyed by many difficulties, and
shaken by cabals, some stimulated by direst foes, others induced by
hollow allies; and the career of the Favourite, like that of all the
fortunate, began to be embittered and precarious.
There required, indeed, much condescension and courtesy to soften the
exasperated feeling of the people against the promoter of the Spanish
match. The pulpits, far from being “tuned” to its praise, were
continually clamouring against the alliance.
There were strange signs of the times when, notwithstanding the almost
absolute dominion of the Crown, it was found necessary to issue orders
that the sanctity of the royal presence, and the dignity of the Privy
Council should not be lowered by persons coming in booted and
spurred--forbidding them also to go into chapel in that guise, and
ordering them to remain uncovered during the services.[62] In former
days, James, as well as Elizabeth, had demanded an almost degrading
respect; but the habits of the monarch had long since brought even
royalty into contempt.
Footnote 62:
State Papers, Domestic, vol. cxxxvii., p. 5.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account