The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sourcesThomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sources
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, 1592-1628
as the Red Cross Knight that was Una’s champion against Archinago."[75]
And this scheme, which produced results afterwards, as well as at the
time they were effected, of the utmost importance to Buckingham, had
been accomplished from the suggestions and by the skill of the Lord
Keeper Williams.
Footnote 75:
Hacket’s Life of Williams, pp. 172, 173.
It may therefore be supposed that Buckingham would listen with reverence
to his representations, when the Lord Keeper ventured to warn him from
the course he was pursuing. So far, however, from such being the case,
the Duke never forgave him for a letter addressed to him whilst in
Spain, advising a reconciliation with the Earl of Bristol, whose
knowledge of Spanish affairs, and repeated success in negotiations,
would, it was thought, secure the completion of the marriage treaty.[76]
Even whilst writing the letter, which seemed to alienate Williams from
Buckingham for a time, the Lord Keeper was aware that he had already
incurred the favourite’s displeasure. “What I wrote formerly,” he says,
“may be ill-placed, and offend your grace, but all proceeded from as
true and sincere a heart as you left behind you in all this
kingdom.”[77] The Earl of Bristol, on hearing of this act of mediation,
argued truly when he anticipated that it would produce a quarrel. He
wrote to Williams to the following effect, “that the friendship of the
Duke was a thing he did infinitely desire, that he did infinitely esteem
the good offices that the Lord Keeper had done therein, but that he
conceived that any motion he had made in that kind had been despised
rather than received with thankfulness.”[78]
Footnote 76:
Hacket’s Life of Williams, p. 147.
Footnote 77:
Ibid.
Footnote 78:
Hacket, 148.
Buckingham had formerly been compared to Alcibiades, the Lord Keeper to
Socrates; but all obligations to that supposed Socrates were henceforth
annulled. The interference of Williams, creditable to himself, and due
to the King, was so misinterpreted that Buckingham withdrew from him his
friendship, forgetting not only the axiom of Solon, “never to choose a
friend suddenly, nor to lose him suddenly,” but the still stronger
argument of services which could not be denied. During the Duke’s
absence in Spain, Williams had watched over his welfare with the utmost
care; he had ventured boldly to speak the truth to him; a benefit
scarcely less important; yet Buckingham could not be appeased.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account