The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
The subject of Christian perfection is summarily dismissed. Tompson
quotes texts of Scripture, and appeals to history, and concludes with
an argument which has been elaborated in modern days: “Suppose that two
persons, _absolutely free from the corruption of human nature_, should
marry and have children, it is very evident, that they could convey no
corruption of nature to their offspring, nor they to theirs, even to
the remotest generations: and, therefore, this _new species_ of mankind
would stand in no need of a Saviour; that is, in no need of Christ’s
righteousness to justify them; in no need of His Spirit to enable them
to do their duty, they being possessed of that rectitude of nature
which will enable them to act entirely for themselves.”
This is quoted, not for its soundness, but, merely to show how feebly
one of the ablest logicians of his age confronted it. The following
is the whole of Wesley’s answer: “As to Christian perfection, I
believe two, who were made perfect in love, never did, or will, marry
together.” This was not argument, but assumption; and Tompson was not
slow to avail himself of his advantage. In his next communication he
asks, “Why is the marriage state proper for those only who are tainted
with sin and corruption?” He reminds his opponent, that two persons,
Adam and Eve, absolutely free from sin, have been married, and that by
the express command of God Himself. Besides, he asks, “Suppose that two
persons, already married, should attain to such a state,—the very same
consequences would inevitably follow; and, I suppose, you will hardly
venture to affirm, that God will never make any married couple (capable
of having children) perfect. If you did, I should ask you first, what
ground you had for such an arbitrary hypothesis? and secondly, how you
came to marry yourself, when you judged it would be an infallible means
of keeping either yourself, or your wife, from that state which is of
all others the most desirable?” Wesley, like a prudent man, attempted
no reply to this; and so the matter ended.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account