Soon after President Lincoln had formed the resolution to
attempt the relief of Sumter, and whilst it was yet a secret, a
young man connected with the telegraph office in Washington,
with whom I was acquainted, a native of the same town with
myself, brought to me successively two telegrams conveying to
the rebel authorities information of the purposes and decisions
of the Administration. One of these telegrams was from Mr.
Harvey, a newspaper correspondent, who was soon after, and with
a full knowledge of his having communicated to the rebels the
movements of the Government, appointed Minister to Lisbon. I
had, on receiving these copies, handed them to the President.
Mr. Blair, who had also obtained a copy of one, perhaps both,
of these telegrams from another source, likewise informed him
of the treachery. The subject was once or twice alluded to in
Cabinet without eliciting any action, and when the nomination
of Mr. Harvey to the Portuguese Mission was announced--a
nomination made without the knowledge of any member of the
Cabinet but the Secretary of State and made at his special
request--there was general disapprobation except by the
President (who avoided the expression of any opinion) and by
Mr. Seward. The latter defended and justified the selection,
which he admitted was recommended by himself, but the President
was silent in regard to it.[51]
Trumbull says in his letter that Lincoln and Seward told the committee
that they did not know that Harvey had sent the dispatch before he
received the appointment. Welles says that both of them knew it
beforehand, and that it was a matter of Cabinet discussion in which
Lincoln, however, took no part. How are we to explain this
contradiction? It was impossible for Lincoln to utter an untruth, but if
we may credit Gideon Welles, _passim_, it was not impossible for Seward
to do so and for Lincoln to remain silent while he did so, as he
remained silent while the Cabinet were discussing the appointment of
Harvey. If Seward, at the meeting of which Trumbull wrote, in this
private letter to his wife, took the lead in the conversation, as was
his habit, and said that there was no knowledge of Harvey's telegram to
Governor Pickens until after Harvey had been appointed as minister, and
Lincoln said nothing to the contrary, he would naturally have assumed
that Seward spoke for both.
There is reason to believe that Seward had previously prevailed upon the
President to agree to surrender Fort Sumter, as a means of preventing
the secession of Virginia. Evidence of this fact is supplied by the
following entry in the diary of John Hay, under date October 22, 1861:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account