It was followed by a supplementary bill even more drastic, providing for
a registration of voters, and requiring each person, before he could be
registered, to take an oath that he had not been disfranchised for
participation in any rebellion, or civil war, against the United States,
and had never held any legislative, executive, or judicial office and
afterwards engaged in rebellion against the United States, or given aid
or comfort to the enemies thereof. The President was not slow to
perceive the monstrosity of these provisions. In his veto message he
dwelt on the absurdity of expecting every man to know whether he had
been disfranchised or not, and what acts amounted to "participation" or
fell short of it, and what constituted the giving of aid and comfort to
the enemies of the United States. With genuine pathos he added:
When I contemplate the millions of our fellow citizens of the
South with no alternative left but to impose upon themselves
this fearful and untried experiment of complete negro
enfranchisement, and white disfranchisement (it may be) almost
as complete, or submit indefinitely to the rigor of martial law
without a single attribute of freemen, deprived of all the
sacred guaranties of our Federal Constitution, and threatened
with even worse wrongs, if any worse are possible, it seems to
me their condition is the most deplorable to which any people
can be reduced.
This bill was passed over the veto on the 23d of March, Trumbull voting
in the affirmative. These votes, however, did not prevent him from
publishing in the Chicago _Advance_ of September 5, the same year, a
carefully written article denying the power of Congress to regulate the
suffrage in the states, concluding with the following paragraphs:
If the views expressed are correct, it follows that there are
but two ways of securing impartial suffrage throughout the
Union. One is, for the states themselves to adopt it, which is
being done by some already; and now that the subject is being
agitated and its justice being made apparent, it is to be hoped
it will soon commend itself to all: the other is, by an
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, adopting
impartial suffrage throughout the Union, which to become
effective must be ratified by three fourths of the States.
Amendments of the constitutions of Ohio, Kansas, and Minnesota for that
purpose were then pending, but they were all voted down by the people in
October and November, 1867.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account