The Life of Tolstoy: First Fifty Years: Fifth EditionMaude, Aylmer
General
The Life of Tolstoy: First Fifty Years: Fifth Edition
Maude, Aylmer
Tolstoy, Leo, graf, 1828-1910
A knowledge of Sacred History was demanded both by the pupils
themselves and by their parents. Of all the oral subjects I tried
during three years, nothing so suited the understanding and mental
condition of the boys as the Old Testament. The same was the case
in all the schools that came under my observation. I tried the
New Testament, I tried Russian History and Geography, I tried
explanations of natural phenomena (so much advocated to-day), but
it was all listened to unwillingly and quickly forgotten. But the
Old Testament was remembered and narrated eagerly both in class and
at home, and so well remembered that after two months the children
wrote Scripture tales from memory with very slight omissions.
It seems to me that the book of the childhood of the race will
always be the best book for the childhood of each man. It seems to
me impossible to replace that book. To alter or to abbreviate the
Bible, as is done in Sonntag's and other school primers, appears
to me bad. All--every word--in it is right, both as revelation and
as art. Read about the creation of the world in the Bible, and
then read it in an abbreviated Sacred History, and the alteration
of the Bible into the Sacred History will appear to you quite
unintelligible. The latter can only be learnt by heart; while the
Bible presents the child with a vivid and majestic picture he will
never forget. The omissions made in the Sacred History are quite
unintelligible, and only impair the character and beauty of the
Scriptures. Why, for instance, is the statement omitted in all the
Sacred Histories, that when there was nothing, the Spirit of God
moved upon the face of the waters, and that after having created,
God looked at His creation and saw that it was good, and that then
it was the morning and evening of such and such a day? Why do they
omit that God breathed into Adam's nostrils the breath of life, and
that having taken one of his ribs He with the flesh closed up the
place thereof, and so forth? One must read the Bible to unperverted
children, to understand how necessary and true it all is. Perhaps
one ought not to give the Bible to perverted young ladies; but
when reading it to peasant children I did not alter or omit a
single word. None of them giggled behind another's back; but all
listened eagerly and with natural reverence. The story of Lot and
his daughters, and the story of Judah's son, evoked horror but not
laughter....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account