Celtic literature -- History and criticism; Ireland -- In literature
So far as our modern knowledge goes, the Arthur of real life was a
Cornish chief with a following in Wales, who met Cedric of Wessex in the
stricken field, but who himself at length fell fighting the Picts, most
probably in our own native Scotland. Gildas chronicles a great victory
won over the Saxons, but omits to record who was the victorious chief.
It is Nennius who first mentions Arthur by name, in the ninth century.
His story is vastly amplified by Geoffrey of Monmouth, who wrote about
1154, and by the time it comes from the pen of Robert Wace, some ten
years later, there is the splendid addition of the Round Table. Layamon
is able to go into details, not hitherto mentioned, of the construction
of this famous Board, which obviated quarrels over uppermost seats,
since no one could have precedence owing to its shape. Up to this point
the legend bore no Christian character. It is saturated with the magic,
and slaughter, and revenge of the old Pagan North, rich in stories of
giants, dwarfs, serpents, and heathen enchantments, far enough removed
from the spirit of medieval Christianity. But by the beginning of the
thirteenth century it suddenly underwent a great development, and new
incidents were added with which the earlier writers could not have been
acquainted.
Thomas Arnold thinks that this transformation is due to the genius of
Walter Map (_circa_ 1210), who introduced the religious element with the
view of converting the Arthurian legends, and employing them in the
service of Christianity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account