The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10)Various
General
The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
In times most ancient—at culture’s dawn of day—the individual was
swallowed up and lost in the life of the tribe. He did not count as an
individual, but was valued only as a member of the group to which he
happened to belong. Subsequently, man’s endowment to personality entered
upon its unfolding—the first syllables of the long human story were
stammered. Man began to become a self. To be a self was to specialize
into a difference from all other men. From that moment on, the entire
course of evolution may be considered as a progressive differentiation
and specialization of the human personality. At the outset there were
only a few splendidly and highly endowed natures that felt a distinct
life of their own welling up in themselves from mysterious springs of
being. They took up the gauge of battle against others, against the mass
which attempted to subject and assimilate them to its peculiarity. Mass
meant monotony. But the differentiating energy and impetus encroached
further and further, passing from the great to the small, pushing into
the mass whose members no longer wanted to be mass, herd, but men. The
might of spiritual personality opposed itself to the superiority of
corporeal peculiarity. Psychical feeling more and more became personal.
Character increasingly received a distinctive stamp. Along with this,
the impulse to self-dependence began to stir even in those men who were
outclassed in physical strength by their stronger human brothers. Later,
when the head and heart, and no longer the fist, formed the strength of
man, woman pressed into the circle of life’s evolution. She was no
longer a mere exemplar of the genius. She, too, would be personality.
This course of events signified an infinite refinement and enrichment of
cultural life on the one side; on the other, it gave rise to the
question as to how, in this differentiation of men into even more
decidedly pronounced personalities, a cohesiveness could be originated
among them that would save life from disintegration and consequent
decay. At bottom, the individual is not sufficient unto himself.
Self-dependent, he would be miserably impoverished and stunted—of this
there can be no doubt, according to the most elementary laws of life.
Hence, along with the formation of human personality, there is a
refinement of those forces of life which seem summoned to secure a bond
of fellowship among men: law, custom, a benevolent disposition toward
others, the feeling of sympathy for others. Even Nietzsche, who foresees
a future in which all these older group forces and moral impulses shall
be obliterated, and every man pander to his own self alone and his own
peculiarity in willing and feeling, in thinking and speaking—even
Nietzsche cannot help preaching a new love that shall bind men together.
Even Zarathustra confesses: “I love men! My will, my ardent will to
creation, impels me constantly to men—as the hammer to the stone!” To be
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account