The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10)Various
General
The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
She is hopeful concerning the final abolishing of prostitution if the
present marriage customs are changed. She is emphatic in the need of
young people being enlightened in regard to marital experiences and
problems, but her suggestions are indefinite and inconclusive. However,
much may be overlooked for her emphasis of the fact that sex is an
active principal and that the best love-life is that which makes the
best use of love’s activities. She admonishes us to “play fair alike in
loving and unloving,” which means that love is not a light thing of a
day, but must be great enough and strong enough to control itself, even
to sacrifice itself for the greatest racial good—and never to sell
itself from a motive of personal selfishness, or for the bliss of an
hour.
The highway that Mrs. Austin lays out for love is rough and stony in
spots, and yet its goal of racial betterment through achievement as well
as by means of offspring is not to be despised.
MARY ADAMS STEARNS.
Dutch Bourgeoisie
_Small Souls_, by Louis Couperus. [Dodd, Mead and Company, New
York.]
Rain, rain.... It is always raining in Holland; the skies are ever
hidden behind muddy clouds, and in the damp, bleak atmosphere straggle
grey figures with stony faces. It is painful to follow Couperus through
the four hundred odd pages of his gloomy novel, to meet only “small
souls,” petty men and women whose sole interest lies in dinner parties
and endless gossip. Empty, tedious, stupid “society,” without even the
piquant vice that makes attractive the bourgeoisie of Balzac,
Maupassant, or Zola. The least boring figure among the asinine menagerie
is that of the heroine, Constance, whose sole virtue consists in the
fact that she had committed adultery in her early life. The author has
not brought in a single positive type of Holland’s artistic or
intellectual circles to counteract the general gloom of the picture; he
has evidently determined to hold his readers within the frame of a
family-epic, to focus their attention on one particular aspect of life
in the Hague, the shallowest, the palest. As this novel presents the
translation of the first part of the author’s tetralogy, we must be
patient and consider the book as a prelude to the developing drama.
Already we see at the end of this volume promising symptoms of a new,
real life, to be manifested in the growing boy, Adrian—big, healthy,
sturdy, who despises his petty relatives with their noisy intrigues, and
whose “boyish lips, with their faint shading of dawn, curve into a
scornful smile as he says: ‘It’s all about nothing!’” We shall eagerly
look forward to the following volumes, for Couperus is an artist, a deep
psychologist, a follower of Zola; his method may be old, arch-realistic,
but, as I say, he is an artist, hence thrilling.
K.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account