The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5)Various
General
The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
And so, if we take up this great subject in a large way, as Nietzsche
has done, we see that we have all broken with the old loyalty, and that
the consummation of this breach has been life and blessing to us.
We moderns all somehow live in a disloyalty which we have
committed--imputed to us as transgression, viewed by us as our strength
and pride. We have all become unfaithful,--as children to our parents,
as pupils to our teachers, as disciples to our masters. We felt
ourselves bound to them; we loosed ourselves from them. The paths they
walked we have forsaken. In the strange untrodden land whither our
vagrant feet have wandered, we "came to ourselves" in declaring
disobedience to the laws of tradition, in breaking loyalty to the rules
of the schools. It is precisely on this account that once again we have
won spiritual life, a living art and science, a living religion and
morality. We have snapped the fetters fastened upon us in the name of
the old loyalty, and all that is great and fruitful and constructive in
the life of the modern spirit is a monument of the disloyalty which its
creators have built thereto. Nothing is gained any longer by our
screening ourselves behind this word loyalty, and making believe that we
shall not be found out! We owe it to ourselves and we owe it to the
world to confess frankly that we have done with the old loyalty to the
unchangeable and the finished, for that is to be loyal to an unreality,
_since there is no such thing_. Even God, if he be the living God,
cannot be the same yesterday, today, and forever. But we owe it even
more to ourselves and to the world to strive for a clear position in
reference to this question which is so profoundly agitating our entire
moral world today. We may not abandon the field to those who would
demolish the temple of the old goddess simply that they may celebrate
upon its ruins the orgies of their caprice and inconstancy and
characterlessness. If ever there was a doctrine whose right is easily
turned into a wrong, whose truth into an error, whose blessing into a
curse, it is this Nietzschean doctrine of the right and the duty of
ceaseless change, of self-dependence, by which we are redeemed from
slavery to the past. If the old loyalty--loyalty to the past--no longer
holds men, wherewith shall they be held? Shall they be like the
weathervane blown hither and thither by every wind of doctrine, or like
the rudderless ship driven aimless and planless over the high seas by
the midnight hurricane? Better a thousand times be tethered to the old
loyalty than to be doomed to such a life of levity and poiselessness and
flightiness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account