The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5)Various
General
The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
But the new loyalty which we seek, without which we go forward into no
future, should it not be more stable and enduring and loyal than the
old? If a moment releases itself from what to it is past, and validates
its right as a self-dependent life to its predecessor, a birth has
transpired in man, and birth means pain. Without such pain, man has
changed his situation, but not himself. A new color has come upon the
motly manifoldness of his life--_he_ has remained the same. Trees do not
have their roots in the air. Weaklings cannot make the real change--it
needs a strength that they do not have. The strength to change
really--only he has this who bears the new loyalty in his own bosom;
loyalty not to his opinion, not to his learning and heritage, but
loyalty to his _growth_, to the great eternal goal of life, to the great
sacred task which he has yet to fulfil in life.
Loyal to ourself? Would that it might be so! But the self that we would
at first be loyal to is not our self at all. It is foreign wares, loaded
upon us,--first even in the nursery, slyly slipped subsequently upon our
shoulders,--foreign words, foreign worths! Loyalty to what satiates, not
the better loyalty to our hunger! We begin to live only when we live in
our hunger; our hunger is we ourselves. It is a good satiety only if a
new hunger comes from it. Loyalty to our self--this is to keep our life
alive in us--a young glad life, that never grows old, because the old is
ever transmuted into a new. This loyalty to ourself,--it is to expel
from every truth its error, from every boundary its limit which blocks
the vision into the wide world, the blue sky, and the distant sea.
Loyalty to men? Would that it might be so! But such loyalty costs so
much trouble and toil. For the faithfulness that is genuine and living,
there is no law, no binding _I must_, only a glorious _I will_. One day
we shall have done with the loyalty which means master and servant,
leader and led--the loyalty of the dog that is loyalest to him who feeds
him best or beats him hardest. One day we shall understand what the
loyalty of man means--this new loyalty toward man, in which souls meet
and chime and work together, and live in each other, yet each remains
itself and true to itself.
So, then, the law of change and of growth is the law of the new loyalty,
as the law of fixedness and finishedness and finality was of the old. It
is the duty of such new loyalty to protect itself against the deadening
force of habit and of petrifaction, to guard itself against any
obedience by which it would become disloyal to itself. Such loyalty is
too honorable to humor inertia and laziness under its banner, too
courageous to conceal cowardice behind a slave's patience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account