The Little Review, March 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 1) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, March 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 1)Various
General
The Little Review, March 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 1)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
“Yes! They found Jack Munsey in her cottage. They found him in
the night. And so, in the name of Christ, whose name they give to
all their wickedness—that Christ, who forgave a woman that was
not blind for sins beside which this sin of Unity’s was pure and
white—in the name of this God, I say, they seized her sightless,
wondering soul and threw it, a sacrifice, to those bloody wolves
they call their virtue.”
I would fain go on quoting, showing you the wit of this man, gentle, and
on occasion barbed and stinging: his humor, kindly, of the soil; his
great jollity and high good spirits. I would indeed like to introduce
you to “Clara,” the hussy, who is fat and motherly and with a heart and
mind unbounded. I would like to take you to “Arthur’s,” the midnight
coffee-stall where you would meet with street-walkers and soldiers,
scavengers and tramps and hear from the lips of a gutter snipe one of
the most perfect and touching love tales ever told.
Oh, but you must read them all yourself. Will you, if I give you the
names of the various volumes? Here they are, then: _Arthur’s_, _Sixpenny
Pieces_, _Cottage Pie_, _Clara_, _Simple Simon_, _Moby Lane_.
John Lane, he of the Bodley Head Publishing Company, who gave the world
_The Yellow Book_, the works of Anatole France and Stephen Leacock, is
the publisher.
I wait expectantly your showers of gratitude!
—_Allan Ross Macdougall._
The Reader Critic
_ANARCHY_
_Alice Groff, Philadelphia_:
Anarchy is scientifically a reductio ad absurdum and those who claim to
be anarchists are self-deceivers,—minds that cannot complete a circuit
of reason. There is no place in reason for anarchy, hence there is not
and cannot be an anarchist on a basis of reason. All who call themselves
so are either _archists_ of the most rabid sort or helpless flies in the
sticky syrup of laissez faire. The only professed anarchists that make
any impression upon the world are of three kinds: either they are
spirits of revolt of the most bitterly, materialistically tyrannical
sort; or they are those who suffer with the oppressed and strive
individually to set them free, even to the point of _self_-martyrdom; or
they are sentimentalists who maunder maudlinly on about love and justice
and yet do absolutely nothing to bring about the love of justice or the
justice of love, either in their preaching or their practice. But none
of these are really anarchists, they are only varieties of _archists_
who wish to impose their _own_ social ideals upon the social order in
place of those that already prevail.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account