The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
The same Whys can be applied to another recent publication[7],
Doroshevich’s impressions. Doroshevich is the most popular journalist in
Russia, a witty, entertaining _feuilletonist_, who employs an original
staccato rhythm. But there is no reason under the sun to translate his
reportorial impressions of the war fugitives, written for a Moscow daily
paper. Their value is purely local. How can we be interested in the
management of the Russian relief-points, or their mismanagement? True,
at times Doroshevich flashes brilliant impressionistic colors, as in
describing the fugitives’ bonfires in the forest. But the rare gems do
not justify the journalistic heap.
I am uneasy about these fallacies of the publishers. Few though they
are, they may serve the part of a spoonful of vinegar in a pot of honey.
----------
[2] _The Mantle and other stories, by Nikolai Gogol. New York:
Frederic A. Stokes._
[3] _Makar’s Dream and other stories, by V. Korolenko. New York:
Duffield._
[4] _Twenty-six Men and a Girl, by M. Gorky. New York: Frederic
A. Stokes._
[5] _The Duel, by A. Kuprin. New York: Macmillan. The River of
Life, by A. Kuprin. Boston: John W. Luce._
[6] _Dostoevsky, by Evgenii Soloviev. New York: Macmillan._
[7] _The Way of the Cross, by Doroshevich. New York: G. P.
Putnam._
The Independent Exhibition
LUPO DE BRAILA
The rich aunt with whose aid the Chicago Society of Artists has managed,
up to the present, to check all artistic impulses in this city, has lost
her magic attraction and power. Her golden smiles and soft pillows have
failed lately to captivate and hold. There is a new breed of young
artists. They seem to be an energetic lot, and decline to live in the
future of promises; and, what is more horrible, they decline to flirt
with the rich aunt through the aid of the honorable society.
For many years she was the bubbling liquid within the life-giving
bottle. The magic corkscrew was in the safe, the combination known to
the initiated few. According to these few, young artists had to go
through a certain process of taming and self-effacement before they were
gradually given the secret. A certain amount of artistic ignorance plus
an ability to pull strings was required of every aspirant. A soft
backbone bent by many kicks was also one of the main requirements.
“Don’t knock, you’ll break the magic bottle” was their watchword. If you
dared to ask questions concerning the sacred duty of the initiated few,
you aroused a hatred that took years to melt,—a hatred that seemed
impossible in such delicate souls. The few artists who refused to be
tamed left the city and have settled in other parts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account