The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
And the philanthropic aunt, like all true philanthropists, acquired all
she could get and paid the minimum price. The paying was usually
accompanied by a lot of pompous actions and was supposed to be received
like a first-class iron cross by a common soldier. You see, the young
talented artist was actually compelled to bribe the art patron to get to
the secret of the combination, and was compelled to listen to all kinds
of insults besides. Here are a favorite few: “I have discovered him”; “I
helped him to get where he is now”; “If it were not for me....” The
artist was also used as a rare orchid at their dinner tables and as
Chinese embroidery at unusual occasions. I know one of these patrons who
even resorted to threats, when a young and independent sculptor refused
to be “discovered.” And such creatures pose as art patrons and
connoisseurs, and hold the combination to the life-giving bottle of this
city.
As a matter of fact, almost all the prestige and almost all the artistic
knowledge possessed by these same patrons was given them by their
so-called protegees at starvation prices. However, the patrons are
hardly to be blamed for this state of affairs. They were made by
well-meaning but mediocre artists whose highest ambitions were foggy
imitations of a certain kind of realism practiced abroad when my
grandmother’s dolls used up most of her time. The saddest or funniest
side of this spectacle is that the patrons have, for the last few years,
advanced in understanding beyond the possibilities of the artists who
have made them. As you can easily see, a most discouraging and
impossible state of affairs. It reached its climax at the last Chicago
Artists’ exhibition, when those in control, to use a popular saying,
rubbed it in. It was a show of the aged and crippled, and prizes were
awarded on the basis of an Old-Age Benefit. It was a slow sickness and
positive in retarding all artistic endeavor in this city.
But like a clear and promising path in this dark jungle comes the first
International Exhibition of Independent Artists. It is a jury-free
exhibition, and every man is allowed to hang two paintings, provided he
pays for the space. And it was a strong indictment against the old
order. It showed how thoroughly it has managed to kill all originality
and individuality in the younger artists. In spite of the fact that it
was a jury-free exhibition you could easily see that almost everyone had
painted with this little thought in the back of his head: This must
please Messrs. Albright, Juergens, and Company. To pick out the few who
made a good showing this time would be unfair to the rest. The whole
show was conceived and arranged in six weeks, and to me it was more
interesting and held more promise than any other show held in this city.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account