The Little Review, October 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 7) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, October 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 7)Various
General
The Little Review, October 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 7)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
There is a melancholy strain in Grillparzer's personality and work which
Schnitzler seems to have inherited. Side by side with the
light-mindedness and ease of the Austrian, a certain tired melancholy
and resignation seem to dwell. This sounds through many creations of
Austrian artists. We hear it in Schubert's music and feel it in the
charming plays of Ferdinand Plaimund, who saw the harmony only in an
upper sphere of fairies and magicians, whereas the life of the human
beings seemed tumultuous and disordered to him.
Austria did not make it easy for her gifted children, and Grillparzer
suffered all his life in his official career. It oppressed him and
warped his creative power. Ludwig Anzengruber had to suffer under the
same disadvantages, but he had a greater fund of good humor to set
against it. He was a man of vigor and _lebensbejahung_ (affirmation of
life). Anzengruber was called the herald of naturalism and the Berlin
people counted him as one of their number, producing his plays together
with those of Ibsen and Hauptmann on the Berlin Free Stage.
Anzengruber applied the heightened sense for reality characteristic of
modern art--be it called naturalistic or neo-romantic--to his own work
and introduced a new material to the drama. The peasant story had been
treated up to now in a moralizing way. The idyl of country innocence was
to be shown and towns-people were to see the purer heart's sentiment
under the dirtier shirts. Anzengruber showed the peasants in their
reality, neither better nor worse. His fingers are unnatural and stiff
in representing types of the cultured classes speaking the literary
German; his peasant types are of wonderful vitality. There is the old
stone-cutter who has thought out a deep pantheistic philosophy. He
relates it in his simple way: how it all came to him--how he was lonely,
poor, lying in his cottage up in the mountains, how he saw the sun lying
on the meadow and wanted to live in the sunshine, not in his miserable
hut when he felt near dying. And then, out in the sunny meadow, it comes
to him like a revelation that he is not really ill, not really poor,
because nothing can happen to him--because everything around belongs to
him and he belongs to everything. This deep pantheistic feeling
expressed in this unpathetic way gives him from now on a perfect good
humor not to be disturbed. He goes among the peasants looking on at
their quarrelings and grumblings and helps them out of their worst
plights in a good-natured way, but without bothering them in the least
with his philosophy or any tendency toward improving them or the world
in general.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account