The London pleasure gardens of the eighteenth centuryWroth, Warwick William
History
The London pleasure gardens of the eighteenth century
Wroth, Warwick William
London (England) -- History -- 18th century; Parks -- England -- London -- History
The ‘Inspector’ of the _London Daily Advertiser_ took his friend
the old Major, to Cupid’s Gardens (as they were still called) on a
pleasant August evening in this year. The Major was delighted with all
he saw. “Now I like this. I am always pleased when I see other people
happy: the folks that are rambling about among the trees there; the
jovial countenances of them delight me ... here’s all the festivity and
all the harmless indulgence of a country wake.”[281]
The country wake element was in evidence late in the evening, and
constables stationed at the gate had occasionally to interfere. One
night, for instance, a pretty young woman, accompanied by a friend,
promenaded the gardens dressed as a man wearing a long sword. No small
sensation was caused in the miscellaneous company, which included a
physician, a templar, a berouged old lady and her granddaughter, and
the sedate wife of a Cheapside fur-seller. “A spirited young thing with
a lively air and smart cock of her hat” passed by. “Gad,” said she, as
she tripped along, “I don’t see there’s anything in it; give us their
cloathes and we shall look as sharp and as rakish as they do.” “What an
air! what a gate! what a tread the baggage has!” exclaimed another.
But the days of Cuper’s were numbered. In the early part of 1752 the
statute-book had been dignified by the addition of 25 George II., cap.
36, entitled, “An Act for the better preventing thefts and robberies
and for regulating places of public entertainment and punishing
persons keeping disorderly houses.” By section 2 of this enactment
it was required that every house, room, garden, or other place kept
for public dancing or music, &c., within the cities of London and
Westminster, or twenty miles thereof, should be under a licence. The
Act took effect from December 1, 1752, and the necessary licence for
the season of 1753 was refused to the management of Cuper’s Gardens.
The widow Evans complained bitterly that she was denied the liberty of
opening her gardens, a misfortune attributed by her to the malicious
representations of ill-meaning persons, but which was really owing,
no doubt, to the circumstance that Cuper’s was degenerating into the
place which Pennant says he remembered as the scene of low dissipation.
Meanwhile Mrs. Evans threw open the grounds (June 1753) as a tea-garden
in connection with the Feathers, and the walks were “kept in pleasant
order.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account