271 Mark i. 20, “they left their father Zebedee in the ship _with the day‐labourers;_” i. 31, “_he took her by the hand_;” ii. 3, “a paralytic _borne of four_;” 4, “they broke up the roof and let down the bed;” iii. 10, “they pressed upon him to touch him;” iii. 20, “they could not so much as eat bread;” iii. 32, “the multitude sat about him;” iv. 36, “they took him _even as he was_,” without his going home first to get what was necessary; iv. 38, “_on a pillow_;” v. 3‐5, v. 25‐34, vi. 40, the ranks, the hundreds, the green grass; vi. 53‐56, x. 17, there came one running, and kneeled to him; x. 50, “casting away his robe;” xi. 4, “a colt tied by the door without in a place where two ways met;” xi. 12‐14, xi. 16, xiii. 1, the disciples notice the _great stones_ of which the temple was built; xiv. 3, 5, 8, xiv. 31, “he spoke yet more vehemently;” xiv. 51, 52, 66, “he warmed himself at the fire;” xv. 21, “coming out of the country;” xv. 40, 41, Salome named. 272 Mark i. 33, 45, ii. 2, 13, iii. 9, 20, 32, iv. 10, v. 21, 24, 31, vi. 31, 55, viii. 34, xi. 18. 273 Mark i. 7, “he bowed himself;” iii. 5, “he looked round with anger;” ix. 38, “he sat down;” x. 16, “he took them up in his arms, and laid his hands on them;” x. 23, “Jesus looked round about;” xiv. 3, “she broke the box;” xiv. 4, “they murmured;” xiv. 40, “they knew not what to answer him;” xiv. 67, &c. 274 Compare Mark iv. 4 sq.; viii. 1 sq.; x. 42 sq.; xiii. 28 sq.; xiv. 43 sq. &c. Matt. xiii 4 sq.; xv. 32 sq.; xx. 28 sq.; xxiv. 32 sq.; xxvi. 47 sq. &c. 275 For more examples, see Scholten, Das älteste Evangelium, Elberfeld, 1869, pp. 66‐78. 276 Mark ix. 37‐50 is another instance of difference of order of sayings between him and St. Matthew. With Mark ix. 37 corresponds Matt. x. 40. With Mark ix. 40 corresponds Matt. xii. 30. With Mark ix. 41 corresponds Matt. x. 42. With Mark ix. 42 corresponds Matt. xviii. 6. With Mark ix. 43 corresponds Matt. v. 29 and xviii. 8. With Mark ix. 47 corresponds Matt. xvii. 9. With Mark ix. 50 corresponds Matt. v. 13. 277 Col. iv. 16; 1 Thess. v. 27. 278 Col. iv. 16. 279 Apost. Const. viii. 5. 280 Luke ii. 19, 51. 281 Luke i. 66. 282 Acts xx. 16. 283 1 Cor. xvi. 8. 284 Epist. xxvii. ad Marcellam. 285 Apost. Const. viii. 33. 286 St. Luke, however, has much that was not available to the deutero‐ Matthew, and St. Mark rigidly confined himself to the use of St. Peter’s recollections only. 287 St. Luke’s Gospel contains Hebraisms, yet he was not a Jew (Col. iv. 11, 14). This can only be accounted for by his using Aramaic texts which he translated. From these the Acts of the Apostles are free.