The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
A year later John Winthrop was appointed to supersede Endicott as
Governor. On his departure with a fleet of eleven ships from England an
address to their "Fathers and Brethren of the Church of England" was
published by Winthrop from his ship, the Arbella, disclaiming the acts
of some among them hostile to the Church of England, declaring their
obligations and attachment to it. He said: "We desire you would be
pleased to take notice of the principles and body of our Company as
those who esteem it an honor to call the Church of England, from whence
we rise, our dear Mother, and cannot part from our native countrie,
where she especially resideth, without much sadness of heart and many
tears in our eyes." It might be confidently expected that Mr. Winthrop,
after this address of loyalty and affection to his Father and Brethren
of the Church of England, would, on his arrival at Massachusetts Bay,
and assuming its government, have rectified the wrongs of Endicott and
his party, and have secured at least freedom of worship to the children
of his "dear Mother." But he did nothing of the kind; he seems to have
fallen in with the very proceedings of Endicott which had been
disclaimed by him in his address.
Thus was the first seed sown, which germinated for one hundred and
thirty years, and then ripened in the American Revolution. It was the
opening wedge which shivered the transatlantic branches from the parent
stock. It was the consciousness of having abused the Royal confidence,
and broken faith with their Sovereign, of having acted contrary to the
laws and statutes of England, that led the Government of Massachusetts
Bay to resist and evade all inquiries into their proceedings; to prevent
all evidence from being transmitted to England, and to punish as
criminals all who should appeal to England against any of their
proceedings; to claim, in short, independence and immunity from all
responsibility to the Crown for anything they did or might do. This
spirit of tyranny and intolerance, of proscription and persecution,
caused all the disputes with the parent Government, and all the
bloodshed on account of religion in Massachusetts, which its Government
inflicted in subsequent years, in contradistinction to the Governments
of Plymouth, Rhode Island, Connecticut and even Maryland.
The church government established by the Puritans at Boston was not a
government of free citizens elected by a free citizen suffrage, or even
of property qualification, but was the "reign of the church, the members
of which constituted but about one-sixth of the population, five-sixths
being mere helots bound to do the work and pay the taxes imposed upon
them by the reigning church but denied all eligibility to any office in
the Commonwealth." It was indeed such a "connection between church and
state" as had never existed in any Protestant country; it continued for
sixty years, until suppressed by a second Royal Charter, as will appear
in the next chapter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account