The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
The inhabitants of Boston and the Province were generally ashamed of the
outrage upon Hutchinson, but the mob still dared to show its hand.
Though in the first rush of feeling many of the rioters were sent to
jail, they were afterwards set free. The chief actor seems to have been
a shoemaker, named Mackintosh, who, though arrested, was presently
discharged; Hutchinson declares this was through the interference of men
of good position, who feared that a confession from him would implicate
them. Hutchinson's demand of the legislature for compensation for the
destruction of his home, was at last effectual. He is said to have
received £3,194, 17s. 6d., a fair indemnity. The Act had attached to it
for a "rider" pardon to all who had taken part in the disturbance
connected with the Stamp Act. Bernard hesitated to sign the Act; but was
finally induced to do so by his earnest wish to have Hutchinson receive
justice. When the Act was sent to England, the King disallowed it; such
lawlessness could not be condoned, even that a faithful official might
receive his rights. But the money had been paid before the news of the
King's displeasure arrived.
A period of lawlessness now followed. Riots were absolutely unpunished,
for no jury would convict the rioters. Governor Bernard wrote that his
position was one of utter, and humiliating impotence, and that the first
condition of the maintenance of English authority in Massachusetts was
to quarter a powerful military force at Boston.
Two regiments arrived Sept. 28, 1768. Shortly before their arrival the
people gathered together in an immense meeting, and voted that a
standing army could not be kept in the province without its consent. On
the arrival of the troops everything was done by the people to provoke
and irritate them. A perfect reign of terror was directed against all
who supported the government. Soldiers could not appear in the streets
without being the objects of the grossest insults. A press eminently
scurrilous and vindictive was ceaselessly employed in abusing them. They
had become as Samuel Adams boasted 'the objects of the contempt even of
women, and children.' Every offence they committed was maliciously
exaggerated and vindictively prosecuted, while in the absence of
martial law, they were obliged to look passively on the most flagrant
insults to authority. At one time the "Sons of liberty" in a procession
a mile and a half long marched around the State House, to commemorate
their riots against the Stamp Act, and met in the open fields to chant
their "liberty song" and drink "strong halters, firm blocks, and sharp
axes, to such as deserve them." At another an informer, who was found
guilty of giving information to revenue officers, was seized by a great
multitude, tarred and feathered, and led through the streets of Boston,
which was illuminated in honor of the achievement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account