The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
In June, 1763, a confederation, including several Indian tribes,
suddenly and unexpectedly swept over the whole western frontier of
Pennsylvania and Virginia. They murdered almost all the English settlers
who were scattered beyond the mountains, surprised every British fort
between the Ohio and Lake Erie, and closely blockaded Forts Detroit and
Pitt. In no previous war had the Indians shown such skill, tenacity, and
concert, and had there not been British troops in the country the whole
of Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Maryland would have been overrun.
The war lasted fourteen months, and most of the hard fighting was done
by English troops, assisted by militia from some of the Southern
colonies. General Amherst called upon the New England colonies to help
their brethren, but his request was almost disregarded. Connecticut sent
250 men, but Massachusetts, being beyond the zone of immediate danger,
would give no assistance. After a war of extreme horror, peace was
signed September, 1764. In a large degree by the efforts of English
soldiers Indian territory was rolled back, and one more great service
was rendered by England to her colonies, and also the necessity was
shown for a standing army.[6]
[6] Trumbull's "His. of the U. S.," 445-467. Hildreth, Graham,
Hutchinson.
The "French and Indian War," as it was commonly called, waged with so
much energy and success, doubled the national debt of England and made
taxation oppressive in that country. The war had been waged mainly for
the benefit of the colonists, and as it was necessary to maintain a
standing army to protect the conquered territory, it was considered but
reasonable that part of the expense should be borne by the Americans.
This was especially so in view that the conquest of Canada had been a
prime object of statesmen and leading citizens of the colonies for many
years.
It has been said on good authority that Franklin brought about the
expedition against Canada that ended with Wolfe's victory on the Plains
of Abraham. In all companies and on all occasions he had urged conquest
of Canada as an object of the utmost importance. He said it would
inflict a blow upon the French power in America from which it would
never recover, and would have lasting influence in advancing the
prosperity of the British colonies. Franklin was one of the shrewdest
statesmen of the age. After egging England on to the capture of Canada
from the French, and then removing the most dreaded enemy of the
colonies, he won the confidence of the court and people of France, and
obtained their aid to deprive England of the best part of a continent.
He was genial, thrifty, and adroit, and his jocose wisdom was never more
tersely expressed than when he advised the signers of the Declaration of
Independence to "hang together or they would hang separately."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account