The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution — John Shaqi
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
At the conclusion of the Peace of Paris in 1763, Great Britain had
ceased to be an insular kingdom, and had become a world-wide empire,
consisting of three grand divisions: the British Islands, India, and a
large part of North America. In Ireland an army of ten or twelve
thousand men were maintained by Irish resources, voted by an Irish
Parliament and available for the general defence of the empire. In India
a similar army was maintained by the despotic government of the East
India Company. English statesmen believed that each of these great parts
of the empire should contribute to the defence of the whole, and that
unless they should do so voluntarily it was their opinion, in which the
great lawyers of England agreed, that power to force contributions
resided in the Imperial Parliament at Westminster, and should be
exercised. It was thought that an army of ten thousand men was necessary
to protect the territory won from France and to keep the several tribes
of American Indians in subjection, especially as it was believed that
the French would endeavor to recapture Canada at the first opportunity.
Americans, it should be remembered, paid no part of the interest on the
national debt of England, amounting to one hundred and forty million
pounds, one-half of which had been contracted in the French and Indian
war. America paid nothing to support the navy that protected its coasts,
although the American colonies were the most prosperous and lightly
taxed portion of the British Empire. Grenville, Chancellor of the
Exchequer, asked the Americans to contribute one hundred thousand pounds
a year, about one-third of the expense of maintaining the proposed army,
and about one-third of one percent of the sum we now pay each year for
pensions. He promised distinctly that the army should never be required
to serve except in America and the West India islands, but he could not
persuade the colonists to agree among themselves on a practical plan for
raising the money, and so it was proposed to resort to taxation by act
of Parliament. At the time he made this proposal he assured the
Americans that the proceeds of the tax should be expended solely in
America, and that if they would raise the money among themselves in
their own way he would be satisfied. He gave them a year to consider the
proposition. At the end of the year they were as reluctant as ever to
tax themselves for their own defence or submit to taxation by act of
Parliament. Then the stamp act was passed--it was designed to raise one
hundred thousand pounds a year, and then the trouble began that led to
the dismemberment of the empire. Several acute observers had already
predicted that the triumph of England over France would be soon followed
by a revolt of the colonies. Kalm, the Swedish traveller, contended in
1748 that the presence of the French in Canada, by making the English
colonists depend for their security on the support of the mother
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account