The machinery of the mindFirth, Violet M. (Violet Mary)
Science
The machinery of the mind
Firth, Violet M. (Violet Mary)
Psychology
The easiest way to grasp the organisation of our complex nervous
structure is to study its evolution from its humble beginnings in the
simplest forms of life.
In single-celled animalculæ, the most primitive type of living
creatures, a single cell performs all the functions of life; it moves,
breathes, assimilates, excretes, and feels. With the development of
multi-cellular organisms, however, different cells are given different
work to do, and made to do that, and nothing else.
It then becomes necessary that co-ordination should be maintained
between the sense organs that perceive the prey and the muscles that
move to its capture, and for this purpose other cells are told off to
specialise in communication.
Thus it will be seen that the functional unit of the nervous system
is not the nerve cell, but what is called the SENSORI-MOTOR ARC,
consisting of a nerve carrying the incoming sensation from a sense
organ and making contact with another nerve which carries the outgoing
impulse to a muscle or organ.
When a multiplicity of muscles becomes available for movement, it is
necessary to further link up the sensori-motor arcs, so that other
parts of the structure may be brought into play, and the response
not be confined to one muscle alone; so nerve cells form loops upon
the arcs, and loops upon the loops, with further intercommunications
among themselves, the organisation becoming more and more elaborate,
admitting of more and more complex reactions to stimulus, till finally
the wonderful complications of the human brain are achieved.
CHAPTER III
HOW AN IDEA ENTERS THE MIND
When an impression is made on a sense organ, the sensation derived from
it is telegraphed up the connecting nerve fibre to the brain, and there
translated, by a process of which we know nothing, from a sensation to
a thought.
We believe that the mind learns by experience to associate certain
kinds of sensation with certain objects or conditions in the
environment, and when it feels these particular sensations, deduces
that certain objects are present, and forms mental images, or thought
models, intended to represent these objects.
The truth of our percepts is determined by the closeness with which
our thought model corresponds to its original. An exact copy is a true
concept, an imperfect copy an inaccurate concept.
We “recognise” an object by a process of classification, noting
its likeness or unlikeness to other objects already known. When
an unfamiliar object attracts our attention, we put it through a
process of comparison until we find to which compartment in our
concept-pictures it should be assigned, and if we cannot find a perfect
match, we put it in the most suitable compartment we can discover,
and then partition off a little subclass for it, thus admitting its
identity in essentials, but its difference in details from the other
occupants of that compartment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account