The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. II, No. 4, October 1905Various
History
The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. II, No. 4, October 1905
Various
History -- Periodicals; United States -- History -- Periodicals
But though the records of those proceedings which fix the blame for
that campaign upon Major-General Halleck were lost or stolen from the
archives of the War Department, Benn Pitman, the phonographic reporter
of the court, had possession of a report of those proceedings. And,
by Act of Congress, approved by President Grant on June 5, 1872, the
Secretary of War was “directed to employ at once Benn Pitman to make
a full and complete transcript of the phonographic notes taken by him
during the said investigation, and to put the same on file among the
records of the War Department, and to furnish a copy of the same to
Congress.”
The report of those proceedings may now be found in “Official
Records,” Series I, Vol. XVI, Part I, pp. 6 to 726, inclusive. The
most melancholy part of the story lies in the fact that Porter, who
certainly helped to save Washington from falling into Lee’s hands, had
his life blasted by Halleck, and died without knowledge that Halleck,
not Pope, was really guilty of the disaster which so nearly resulted in
the abandonment of the Capital to the Confederates, and while Halleck
was directing affairs in the West in such a manner as to imperil
Cincinnati.
The remarkable co-operation between Pope and Buell for the surrender
of those cities, and which was attempted by Halleck, does not look
like a concatenation of accidental circumstances. This is accentuated
by the charge against Halleck’s loyalty to the Republic which was made
by the gallant Wallace after he had presided over that Buell military
court. He was a careful man; and, being a good lawyer, he understood
the laws and effect of evidence. Porter, who prevented the surrender
of Washington, and Buell, who saved Cincinnati, were both punished.
It looks as if they had interfered with Halleck’s plan of a general
surrender.
L’ENVOI
In January, 1899, the writer commenced to unravel the mystery
surrounding the battle of Harper’s Ferry, which culminated in the
surrender of that post September 15, 1862. He was a member of that
garrison, and he knew that history had not truthfully recorded the
defense, some chronicles reading that “Harper’s Ferry fell without a
struggle,” others that “there was no defense”; in the main, historians
were a unit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account