The Mail Pay on the Burlington Railroad: Statements of Car Space and All Facilities Furnished for the Government Mails and for Express and Passengers in All Passenger Trains on the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad — John Shaqi
The Mail Pay on the Burlington Railroad: Statements of Car Space and All Facilities Furnished for the Government Mails and for Express and Passengers in All Passenger Trains on the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad
History
The Mail Pay on the Burlington Railroad: Statements of Car Space and All Facilities Furnished for the Government Mails and for Express and Passengers in All Passenger Trains on the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company; Railway mail service -- United States
The original circular of the Post Office Department contained certain
"notes," to the effect that in reporting the length of postal cars and
apartment cars, and the space therein used for mails, the railroad
companies should only report the length or space "authorized" by the
officials of the Department; also that in reporting space used in cars
for what is known as the "Closed Pouch Service," the railroads should
make an arbitrary allowance of six linear inches across the car for
the first 200 pounds or less of average daily weight of pouch mail and
three linear inches for each additional 100 pounds.
These directions were modified by the subsequent circular letter of
the Department, dated October 23, 1909.
This letter, among other things, directs the company to take credit
for "surplus" space in post office cars and apartment cars, if
actually used for the storage of mails.
The practical difficulties attending the measurement and proper
allotment of the space used for the mails in postal and other cars run
on a passenger train will be better understood when it is known that
such space is or may be described in at least eight different ways,
and is actually used on the Burlington road as follows, namely:
1. Space in post office cars specially "authorized" (43.03%).
2. Space in apartment cars specifically "ordered" (20.69%).
3. Space ordered in post office cars operated in lieu of apartment
cars (4.3%).
4. Additional space actually used for storage of mails when the
railroad company operates larger post office or apartment cars than
the authorization calls for (1.5%).
5. Space in storage cars actually used for mails (12.87%).
6. Space in baggage cars used for closed pouch mails (4.06%).
7. The return deadhead movement of space ordered and required in one
direction only (8.35%).
(Ninety-five per cent of all the "space" shown in these returns for
the Burlington, as used for the mails, comes within the foregoing
seven classes, as properly authorized space about which no question
can arise.)
8. "Surplus" space; that is, space furnished to the Government in post
office and apartment cars in excess of actual requirements (5.2%).
This five per cent is the only portion of the space claimed as used
for mails regarding which any question can be raised, affecting the
integrity of these returns.
What is the correct view as to this five per cent?
It is manifestly against the interest of the railroad company to
furnish space for mails that is not required, and it will never
furnish such space if it can be avoided. But the "requirements" of the
Post Office Department are not fixed and certain quantities, by any
means. It is entirely impracticable for any railroad company to keep
on hand at all times a supply of cars of all lengths in order to meet
exactly the requirements of the Department officials.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account