The Making of a Modern Army and its Operations in the Field: A study based on the experience of three years on the French front (1914-1917)Radiguet, René-Louis-Jules
History
The Making of a Modern Army and its Operations in the Field: A study based on the experience of three years on the French front (1914-1917)
Radiguet, René-Louis-Jules
Armies; Military art and science; World War, 1914-1918
2. Different sorts of artillery: Artillery of an Army; Artillery
of an Army Corps; Artillery of a Division; Trench artillery
“Tanks,” or artillery of assault.
3. Mission and use of the artillery during a battle.
4. Anti-aircraft artillery.
5. Advance or withdrawal of the batteries.
6. Conclusion.
=1. Retrospective view.= _General considerations._ In the French
army long before the war, several clear-headed and well-informed men
had foreseen the necessity of having a large, heavy field artillery,
similar to that of Germany.
To recall General Pétain’s motto: “The artillery conquers the
positions, the infantry occupies them”--this simple axiomatic statement
obviously compels the inference that an army shall possess an artillery
able to bombard efficiently every species of fortification.
Unfortunately few people in the Government or parliamentary spheres
could be brought to consider the possibility of a war; so this question
of a heavy artillery, although continually agitated in those circles,
remained unsolved.
In 1914, the immense majority of the French nation, including not only
the politicians but also a great many army officers, scoffed at the
possibility of a war with Germany. The Moroccan imbroglio, the war in
the Balkans, and the Austrian policy of conquest were not sufficient
warning for them. That France’s military preparation was entirely
inadequate, and that this was due solely to the lethargy of the
national mind, is generally admitted to-day. During the first year of
the war, not only were we hopelessly outclassed in heavy artillery, but
at Lille, Maubeuge, and La Fère the Germans captured a goodly number
of our heavy guns with their munitions, and turned them against us.
Fortunately we are able to assert that they used them with very little
advantage to themselves.
Only a few heavy-artillery regiments existed before the war. Their
armament included few quick-firing 155 mm. Rimailho guns, which, though
rapid in action, were too short in range. Other batteries were armed
with 120 and 155 mm. siege guns; good types, but too small in calibre,
and too slow in action. Moreover all these guns were placed at the
disposal of armies which, at the beginning of the conflict, considered
them as a reserve stock and kept them too far from the battle-fields of
August and September, 1914.
The impossibility of following up the victory of the Marne gradually
opened the eyes of the Government to the need of a very large, heavy
artillery, but this necessity was frankly admitted only in the autumn
of 1915, and then largely under the influence of the example given by
our British Allies. They had much more quickly comprehended that no
victory would be possible unless supremacy in artillery was achieved,
and, with their usual cold determination, had turned all the resources
at their disposal to the manufacture of every kind of gun, and
mountains of ammunition.
France followed the example.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account