The Man from Mars: His Morals, Politics and ReligionSimpson, William
Philosophy
The Man from Mars: His Morals, Politics and Religion
Simpson, William
Social problems; Utopias
We have now assumed for the purpose of comparison that the two
cities, one of Mars and one of the Earth, have each three hundred
thousand inhabitants; and that, allowing for women and children not
engaged in productive industry, one hundred thousand of each city is
actively engaged in industrial pursuits. As the general prosperity
of each city depends upon the earnings of this one hundred thousand,
and the accumulations in capital and wealth upon the amount saved
by these productive classes, let us make a relative estimate of the
opportunities each possess in individual savings. Having no common
medium of exchange upon which to base our estimate, let us take the
value of a day’s labor for that purpose. The income of a city is
derived from two sources, the aggregate wages of its inhabitants,
and the combined profits of its capital. The latter, however, being
entirely derived from consumers, is largely contributed to by the
inhabitants themselves. And for the reason that all imported products,
as well as those exported, bear the profits of capital in their rates
of sale, we may safely say that an amount very nearly equal to the
whole profits of capital of a city is paid by the consumers within
its limits as capital profits. The chief source of your city’s yearly
income then is about thirty-one million days’ labor. Out of this you
must pay for expenses, under your system, two million days’ labor for
government taxes, fifteen million days’ labor for ground rent, two
million days’ labor for water, two million days’ labor for insurance,
and with the balance of ten million days’ labor you must pay the cost
of food, raiment, fuel, the portion of rent estimated in buildings,
together with the various incidentals of furniture and house lights.
You will observe that all these expenses except the first are largely
loaded with the profits of capital, so that with the income and expense
as set forth you may be in a progressive condition, as that term
is defined by you. That is to say, your capital may increase, and
your wealth may be very greatly augmented. The enormous proportion
of your earnings carried away by rent, although drawn very largely
from your business districts, is contributed equally by the whole
in the increased cost of all products consumed. Of your one hundred
thousand producers, it is safe to say that twenty thousand of them have
capital investments. Among these is divided the whole of the surplus
of the city’s earnings. The eighty thousand engaged in the business
of directly creating wealth are doomed, under your cruel system, to
sweat and toil from sun to sun without accumulations. You accept this
condition of things as inevitable, and your economists contend that the
real or natural remuneration of labor is the bare means of subsistence.
We have seen the unrighteous origin of this prodigious fund, which
absorbs one third of the earnings of labor at least: let us examine its
perpetual effects upon the interests of those who toil.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account