That reminded him of another chink in his armour. A man of the world
must have the knack of speaking to the world, and Sam became a member of
the Concentrics. As Anne once told him, he had the gift of the gab, but,
except for his present fluent recommendations of houses to prospective
tenants, it was a talent he had buried. Now, however, he proposed to
dig it up and did it in (he thought) the ambitious surroundings of the
Concentrics, who were indeed as mixed a company as he could have found
anywhere, and on that account the better for his purpose.
The common centre which was supposed to hold the Concentrics together
was a love of literature, but they tended to drop literature for
politics on the slightest pretext. There were literary enthusiasts
amongst them, but it rarely happened that one man’s enthusiasm coincided
with another’s. It did less than coincide. A member would read a
laborious paper on some man of letters, and the subsequent discussion
would be conducted by men who began their intelligent speeches by
admitting that they had not read a word of, say, Henry James or Lafcadio
Hearn, but that their opinion was nevertheless so and so. Whereas, of
course, nobody ever confessed to ignorance of politics. Politics is like
law, only more so. One is presumed by the law to know the law, which is
highly presumptuous of the law, because not even the lawyers know the
law, and they must often go to judges, at their client’s expense, to
find out what the law is: and the “more so,” as applied to politics, is
that while laymen hesitate to argue a point of law, and go to an expert,
they never hesitate to argue a point of politics, and _are_ the expert.
Political discussions amongst the Concentrics were real and passionate,
literary discussions unreal and frigid; and as “social reform” became
a favourite shibboleth about this time, literature took a back seat
in favour of subjects about which men could grow emotional and their
oratory rhetorical. It was all one to Sam, who was here to speak, and
did his reading at home.
He spoke often, so that he soon improved, and he practised the literary
allusiveness which was the purpose of his reading to such effect that
he attracted the attention of the chairman, who was the Rev. Peter
Struggles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account