The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
In France it was long before the Reformation reached the lower
classes--the masses, as it is the fashion to call them; the rural
gentry, the men of education, the well-to-do tradesmen, artists, and
“all who from their callings possessed any elevation of mind,” were
the first converts.[8] They were naturally opposed by the clergy and
the lawyers, for corporate bodies are always great enemies to change.
Francis I. appears to have seen the desirability of a reform in the
Church, not so much from religious as from political motives. He
hated the monks, and was thwarted by the Sorbonne; he read the Holy
Scriptures with his sister Margaret, and took the extraordinary step
of inviting Melanchthon to France in order to arrange some compromise
by which Popery and Protestantism might be united. It was a vain
dream, even if the king were sincere, which is exceedingly doubtful.
He might at one time have pleaded that the persecutions were carried
on without his knowledge and even in defiance of him; but on 21st
January, 1535, he took an active part in the burning of six unfortunate
“Lutherans.” In this case his pride had been hurt by some rude and
indefensible proceedings of the Reformed party;[9] but he could be
equally unfeeling and unscrupulous from mere political expediency. In
the same month of January, 1535, he issued a royal edict commanding
the instant extirpation of heresy in every form; all who aided or
harbored heretics, or did not inform against them, were to be punished
as principals; and informers were to receive one-fourth part of the
confiscation and fines--a sure mode of procuring victims. This decree
was modified in June, when Francis was coquetting with the Protestant
princes of Germany; but the pains and penalties were only remitted to
such as abjured their faith and returned to the bosom of the Church.
On 1st June, 1540, appeared the famous edict of Fontainebleau,
confirming all previous edicts, and ordering the strictest search to
be made for heretics; and, as if its provisions were not harsh enough,
letters patent were issued at the end of October, 1542, enjoining every
parliament in the kingdom to “execute prompt and rigorous judgment,”
so that the new heresy might be destroyed root and branch. No time was
lost in carrying out these dreadful instructions. Among the victims
of this renewed persecution was one Delavoye, who being told that a
warrant was out against him, and that the officers were on their way to
seize him, refused to hide himself as his friends advised. “Hirelings
and false prophets may do so,” he said; “but following the example of
St. Paul, ‘_I am ready not to be bound only, but also to die for the
name of the Lord Jesus._’” Another sufferer, Constantine by name,
was taken to execution in a scavenger’s cart. In allusion to this he
said, “Truly hath the apostle declared, ‘_We are as the filth of the
earth, and the offscouring of all things._’ We stink in the nostrils
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account