The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
of the men of this world; but let us rejoice, for the savor of our
death will be acceptable to God and serviceable to the Church.”
A German residing in Paris in the summer of 1542 wrote to a friend
an account of the execution of two heretics which he had witnessed.
In his letter we learn how sympathy for the victims tended to make
converts. One of them was a smooth-cheeked youth under twenty years
of age, the son of a shoe-maker; the other, a man with a long white
beard, stooping under the burden of fourscore years. The young man had
spoken contemptuously of images, comparing them to the gods of the
heathen; the old man had protested against prayers to the saints, and
had declared that all Christians were priests. Both were condemned to
suffer at the same stake for their “Lutheranism,” as it was called.
As the youth refused to retract, he was to have his tongue cut out.
No change could be observed in his face when the hangman approached
him to perform this first act of cruelty. He put the tongue out as far
as he could, the torturer pulled it out still farther with pinchers,
and cut it off, slapping the martyr with it on the cheek. He then
threw the tongue among the crowd, who, “it is said,” adds the writer
conscientiously, “picked it up and flung it back in the martyr’s face.
As he got out of the cart, he looked as if he were going to a feast
and not to punishment.” Unmoved by the howling and the savage cries
of the mob, he took his place calmly at the post, where a chain was
passed round him. He now and then spat the blood from his mouth, but
kept his eyes fixed on heaven, as if looking there for help. When the
executioner covered his head with sulphur and pointed to the fire, he
still smiled and bowed, as if to show he died willingly. The old man,
who was the father of a large family and much respected for his upright
life, had retracted, and his punishment was consequently modified. He
was strangled before being thrown into the flames; “yet some,” adds the
eye-witness, “thought this punishment too mild, and would have had him
burned alive.”[10]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account