The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
dares not decide nor even evince a preference.... The principal
Roman Catholics of this court show much zeal, but they are men of
words more than of deeds.” In the evening of the 23d, Alva was again
summoned to the queen’s presence; he found her walking alone with her
daughter in a long gallery. Isabella pressed her to dismiss L’Hopital,
the chancellor: “I am persuaded,” she continued, “that so long as
he is maintained in his present post, your good subjects alone will
have reason to dread and fear, while the bad will find shelter and
countenance.” To which Catherine replied: “I can not admit the truth
of my daughter’s observations.” Alva, to excuse her, added: “The queen
my mistress has only pressed your majesty thus hardly because the king
my master wishes to ascertain positively from your majesty and the king
your son whether it is the intention of your majesties to put down
heresy or not, as in either case my master will know how to govern his
conduct.” To this Catherine replied, with no little haughtiness: “The
council will give the reply demanded by my son the Catholic king.”
The last conference was held on the 28th June, and at it were present
the king and the two queens, Anjou, Alva, Don Juan Manrique, Don
Francisco Alava, Montpensier, the Cardinals of Bourbon, Guise, and
Lorraine, and the Constable Montmorency. After some remarks about
accepting the canons of the Council of Trent, the discussion turned on
the best mode of settling the religious differences. The Duke of Alva
said: “It seems to me that this is not the moment to root out the evil
with the sword, or to treat it merely with mildness and dissimulation;
for, on the one hand, my master can hardly approve that your majesty
should raise an army and lead it against your own subjects, and,
on the other, there seems no sufficient reason for leaving those
unpunished who are too audacious. I would not set religion on the
uncertain footing of the chances of a war, in which one evil accident
may throw all into the greatest danger.... Some persons, as I have
been told, have advised your majesty to take up arms against those of
the religion. I have not come to France to do it so bad a service,
nor would the king my master have sent me for such a purpose.”[365]
Cardinal Granvelle was of the same opinion; there were safer ways of
getting rid of troublesome enemies than by war: the government had
only to seize five or six of the chief Huguenots and cut off their
heads.[366] That the King of Spain entertained similar views we learn
from his remarks to Sigismond Cavalli, the Venetian embassador, that
the French troubles were owing to the neglect of the advice he had
given them years before.[367] Neither Charles nor Catherine would make
any promises; they thought the state of France was satisfactory, but
would willingly listen to any suggestions and deliberate very carefully
upon them. For one incident of the conference we are indebted to Prince
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account