The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
cause.” But why was he murdered? Perhaps the following passage from a
letter written by the queen-mother to the French embassador in England
may supply an answer: “We strongly suspect Villequier, Lignerolles, or
Sarret; and it is possible that all three may be the authors of these
fancies [Anjou’s refusal to marry Elizabeth]; if I were sure of it, I
give you my word they should repent it.”
If this foul murder be supposed to tell against the king, the affair
of the Gastine Cross should be taken as a proof of his desire to
conciliate his Protestant subjects. In the Rue St. Denis at Paris there
lived a wealthy tradesman, Philip Gastine by name, who with his son
Richard was accused and hanged for heresy and lending money to the
rebels; another son was sentenced to the galleys for life; and the
third banished (30th June, 1569). His house was pulled down, and in its
place was erected a huge cross, with an inscription to the effect, that
they had suffered “principally because they had celebrated the Lord’s
Supper in that place.” According to the thirty-second article[498]
of the Third Edict of Pacification, this cross was to be destroyed.
The king gave the necessary orders, and Claude Marcel, provost of the
merchants, fearing opposition, began to pull it down one dark night
in December. He was interrupted by the populace, who paraded the city
calling to arms. “The common people,” said Walsingham, “ease their
stomachs only by uttering certain seditious words.” They went however
beyond words, for there was a fierce riot, during which the mob burned
two houses and killed a “sermoner.” The provost seems to have been
rather faint-hearted in the matter, and the parliament actually wrote
to remonstrate with the king for keeping his promise. Charles, who was
then at Amboise, returned a very sharp answer (15th December, 1571):
“I have received your remonstrance, which I will always listen to
graciously so long as you show me due obedience. But seeing how you
have behaved since my accession, and that you imagine I will suffer my
orders to be despised, I will let you know that there never was a king
more determined to be obeyed than I am.”[499] The captain of the watch
was sent to Amboise to explain: he found the king very excited. “I am
thoroughly vexed,” said Charles, “that the cross has not been pulled
down or removed. I will have no delay: it is time it were down and
over.[500] If you catch any rioter, hang him up at once with a label
of _Séditieux_ round his neck.” The parliament apologized, and
said very falsely that they had had nothing to do with the riots. On
the night of the 19th December the cross was taken down and re-erected
in the cemetery of the Innocents;[501] but the people were in such
a mutinous state, and it was so difficult to keep the peace, that,
on the 21st, the Duke of Montmorency hurried to Paris with a strong
force of soldiers to put down the rioters. Some were killed, many ran
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account