The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
the severest persecution he had to undergo was that he endured at the
hands of his fellow-workmen. We all know how much this prevails in
large factories and in trade unions among us: and it must have been
incalculably worse at a time when the guilds were such close bodies
that it was impossible to carry on a trade independently of them.
Henry II., like his father, cared little about the new doctrines,
so long as they were confined to the learned and the well-born: but
when they spread among the lower classes, he determined to punish
heresy as worse than treason. His father’s edicts were carried out
with great severity; but they were so far from producing the desired
effect, that the Reform spread more and more. In order to hasten its
extirpation, a new edict was issued (19th November, 1549), in which,
after complaining that the bishops and their suffragans proceeded too
slowly and tenderly--a statement which it is hard to accept--Henry
established special chambers of Parliament for the trial and punishment
of heresy only. It was a kind of lay inquisition, of which all the
judges in the realm, both civil and ecclesiastical, were members
_ex officio_. These were the famous _chambres ardentes_,
so called, says Mezeray, “because they burned without mercy every
one they convicted.” But the new edict appears to have had as little
effect as its predecessors, for in the following month of February
the king by letters patent reproached the judges for want of zeal “in
discharging their duty in this holy and laudable work, so acceptable
to God.” Finally the sanguinary edict of Chateaubriant[48] was issued
(27th June, 1551), by which all the old laws on heresy were revised and
codified. In the preamble, after recounting the efforts of his father
as well as his own to suppress heresy, Henry declared that “the error
went on increasing day by day and hour by hour;” that it was “like
the plague, so contagious that in many large cities it had infected
the majority of the inhabitants, men and women of every station, and
even the little children had sucked in the poison;” and that he saw
no hope of amendment except by employing the severest measures “to
overcome the willfulness and obstinacy of that wretched sect, and to
purge and clear the kingdom of them.” The magistrates were, therefore,
ordered to search unceasingly for heretics, and to make domiciliary
visits in quest of forbidden books (among which the Latin Bible of
Robert Stephens was included).[49] This edict made denunciation a
trade by giving the informer one-third of the heretic’s confiscated
property, and farther enacted that a person acquitted of heresy in any
ordinary court of justice might be again tried before an ecclesiastical
tribunal, and _vice versâ_, thus depriving the poor Reformer of
all chance of escape. Every suspected person was required to possess a
certificate of orthodoxy, and even intercession on behalf of convicted
heretics was made penal. These severities--though they were called
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account