The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
History
The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
Drama, Medieval -- History and criticism; Theater -- History -- Medieval, 500-1500
The ceremony of the burial or _Depositio Crucis_ is followed by the
_Missa Praesanctificatorum_, the Good Friday communion with a host not
consecrated that day but specially reserved from Maundy Thursday; and
there is no further reference to the sepulchre until the order for Easter
day itself is reached, when St. Ethelwold directs that ‘before the bells
are rung for Matins the sacristans are to take the cross and set it in a
fitting place.’
In the _Concordia Regularis_, then, the _Depositio Crucis_ is a sequel
to the _Adoratio Crucis_ on Good Friday. The latter ceremony, known
familiarly to the sixteenth century as ‘creeping to the cross,’ was one
of great antiquity. It was amongst the Holy week rites practised at
Jerusalem in the fourth century[46], and was at an early date adopted
in Rome[47]. But the sepulchre was no primitive part of it[48]; nor is
it possible to trace either the use which served St. Ethelwold as a
model[49], or the home or date of the sepulchre itself. It is unlikely,
however, that the latter originated in England, as it appears almost
simultaneously on the continent, and English ritual, in the tenth
century, was markedly behind and not in advance of that of France and
Germany[50]. St. Ethelwold speaks of it as distinctively monastic but
certainly not as universal or of obligation amongst the Benedictine
communities for whom he wrote. Nor did the _Concordia Regularis_ lead
to its invariable adoption, for when Ælfric adapted St. Ethelwold’s
work for the benefit of Eynsham about 1005 he omitted the account of
the sepulchre[51], and it is not mentioned in Archbishop Lanfranc’s
Benedictine _Constitutions_ of 1075[52]. At a later date it was used by
many Benedictine houses, notably by the great Durham Priory[53]; but the
Cistercians and the Carthusians, who represent two of the most famous
reforms of the order, are said never to have adopted it, considering it
incompatible with the austerity of their rule[54]. On the other hand it
was certainly not, in mediaeval England, confined to monastic churches.
The cathedrals of Salisbury[55], York[56], Lincoln[57], Hereford[58],
Wells[59], all of which were served by secular canons, had their
sepulchres, and the gradual spread of the Sarum use probably brought a
sepulchre into the majority of parish churches throughout the land[60].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account