The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
History
The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
Drama, Medieval -- History and criticism; Theater -- History -- Medieval, 500-1500
I have attempted to arrange the dozen or so complete Epiphany plays known
to scholars in at least the logical order of their development. There
are also three fragments, which fit readily enough into the system. Two,
from a Paris manuscript and from Einsiedeln, may be classed respectively
with the Compiègne and Strassburg texts[187]. The third, from Vienne,
is an independent version, in leonine hexameters, of the scene in which
the _Magi_ first sight the star, a theme common to all the plays except
that of Limoges[188]. I do not feel certain that this fragment is from a
liturgical drama at all.
The textual development of the _Stella_ is closely parallel to that of
the _Quem quaeritis_. The more primitive versions consist of antiphons
and prose sentences based upon or in the manner of the Scriptures. The
later ones, doubtless under the influence of wandering scholars, become
increasingly metrical. The classical tags, from Sallust and Virgil, are
an obvious note of the scholarly pen. With the exception of that from
Limoges, all the texts appear to be derived by successive accretions and
modifications from an archetype fairly represented at Rouen. The Bilsen
text and the Vienne fragment have been freely rewritten, and the process
of rewriting is well illustrated by the alternative versions found
side by side in the later Nevers manuscript. With regard to the place
occupied by the _Stella_ in the Epiphany services, such manuscripts as
give any indications at all seem to point to a considerable divergence
of local use. At Limoges and Nevers, the play was of the nature of a
trope to the Mass, inserted in the former case at the _Offertorium_,
in the latter at the _Communio_[189]. At Rouen the _Officium_ followed
Tierce, and preceded the ordinary procession before Mass. At Fleury the
use of the _Te Deum_ suggests that it was at Matins; at Strassburg it
followed the _Magnificat_ at Vespers, but on the octave of Epiphany, not
Epiphany itself. Perhaps the second part of the Fleury play was also on
the octave. At Bilsen the play followed the _Benedicamus_, but with this
versicle nearly all the Hours end[190]. I do not, however, hesitate to
say that the Limoges use must have been the most primitive one. The
kernel of the whole performance is a dramatized _Offertorium_. It was a
custom for Christian kings to offer gold and frankincense and myrrh at
the altar on Epiphany day[191]; and I take the play to have served as a
substitute for this ceremony, where no king actually regnant was present.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account