The Memoirs of a Failure: with an Account of the Man and His ManuscriptKittredge, Daniel Wright
Science
The Memoirs of a Failure: with an Account of the Man and His Manuscript
Kittredge, Daniel Wright
Failure (Psychology) -- Fiction; Harvard University -- Fiction; University of Virginia -- Fiction
“What a puny ignoramus you are!” exclaimed the Great Axilla, “where
can you have lived and not have been taught the underlying principles
of cowardice? And I, sir, have specimens to illustrate each of those
principles. Do you not even know the three grand divisions of cowards:
the Physical Coward, the Moral Coward and the Intellectual Coward?”
“Have we not time to go in and see some of them?”
The Excelsior consulted his travelling dial, and said:
“It is almost time for my afternoon siesta, but if you will make haste
and not interrupt me with your insipid questions, I can give you a
quick tour of inspection.”
We alighted and ran in through the low, grated portals.
“Here,” said the Excelsior, as we entered the first tier of cells,
“are the Physical Cowards. They are too ordinary and common to need
explanation. They are divided into two main subdivisions. Firstly, the
positive physical coward, who, having neither intellect nor morality on
his side, resorts to force. And when he defeats you by the strength of
his bull neck and coarse fists he declares that he has proved himself
in the right.
“The second subdivision, which comprises those cells on the left-hand
side, consists of the other and even more common variety. That is, a
person who will not risk his body for the chance of protecting another,
or who will not give up his cheap life for his country. A philosopher
of your country once remarked, ‘’Tis man’s perdition to be safe, when
for the Truth, he ought to die!’”
The Excelsior took me by the arm and escorted me up a flight of
winding stairs, until we reached a shaky, moving platform. The Axilla
expatiated as follows:
“On this higher level in this second tier of cells, live my Moral
Cowards. Their cowardice has to do with character. Here too, there are
subdivisions. Firstly, those who prefer to be what they are, and not
what they might be. My friend, I speak with all due reverence: your
Savior spoke of the Sin against the Holy Ghost, and here I think is
that sin’s personification. For, the Unpardonable Sin, as I understand
it, is not to struggle, not to strive to do right even though failure
faces you at every turn, but instead to give up and become satiated
with sloth, to yield to the worst elements in your nature and to grovel
in their lowness. Bah! Do not start me talking about them, for it
taints my own soul.
“The other and more open moral coward, and therefore the more simple,
is he or she who takes out his or her anger, not upon himself or
herself who is really to blame, but foists the blame upon another, as
the wolf found pretext against the lamb. Then of course, there is also
that vast class who openly attack one of their sex for having done what
they themselves would inwardly like to do. This last variety has always
struck me as being the most human of all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account